Original source · Published January 2026 · Updated January 2026

Course overview

Rationale

Mathematics is a unique and powerful intellectual discipline that is used to investigate patterns, order, generality and uncertainty. It is a way of thinking in which problems are explored and solved through observation, reflection and logical reasoning. It uses a concise system of communication, with written, symbolic, spoken and visual components. Mathematics is creative, requires initiative and promotes curiosity in an increasingly complex and data-driven world. It is the foundation of all quantitative disciplines.

To prepare students with the knowledge, skills and confidence to participate effectively in the community and the economy requires the development of skills that reflect the demands of the 21st century. Students undertaking Mathematics will develop their critical and creative thinking, oral and written communication, information & communication technologies (ICT) capability, ability to collaborate, and sense of personal and social responsibility — ultimately becoming lifelong learners who demonstrate initiative when facing a challenge. The use of technology to make connections between mathematical theory, practice and application has a positive effect on the development of conceptual understanding and student disposition towards mathematics.

Mathematics teaching and learning practices range from practising essential mathematical routines to develop procedural fluency, through to investigating scenarios, modelling the real world, solving problems and explaining reasoning. When students achieve procedural fluency, they carry out procedures flexibly, accurately and efficiently. When factual knowledge and concepts come to mind readily, students are able to make more complex use of knowledge to successfully formulate, represent and solve mathematical problems. Problem-solving helps to develop an ability to transfer mathematical skills and ideas between different contexts. This assists students to make connections between related concepts and adapt what they already know to new and unfamiliar situations. With appropriate effort and experience, through discussion, collaboration and reflection of ideas, students should develop confidence and experience success in their use of mathematics.

The major domains of mathematics in Mathematical Methods are Algebra, Functions, relations and their graphs, Calculus and Statistics. Topics are developed systematically, with increasing levels of sophistication, complexity and connection, and build on algebra, functions and their graphs, and probability from the P–10 Australian Curriculum. Calculus is essential for developing an understanding of the physical world. The domain Statistics is used to describe and analyse phenomena involving uncertainty and variation. Both are the basis for developing effective models of the world and solving complex and abstract mathematical problems. The ability to translate written, numerical, algebraic, symbolic and graphical information from one representation to another is a vital part of learning in Mathematical Methods.

Students who undertake Mathematical Methods will see the connections between mathematics and other areas of the curriculum and apply their mathematical skills to real-world problems, becoming critical thinkers, innovators and problem-solvers. Through solving problems and developing models, they will appreciate that mathematics and statistics are dynamic tools that are critically important in the 21st century.

Syllabus objectives

The syllabus objectives outline what students have the opportunity to learn.

1. Recall mathematical knowledge.

When students recall mathematical knowledge, they recognise features of remembered information. They recognise relevant concepts, rules, definitions, techniques and algorithms.

2. Use mathematical knowledge.

When students use mathematical knowledge, they put into effect relevant concepts, rules, definitions, techniques and algorithms. They perform calculations with and without technology.

3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.

When students communicate mathematical knowledge, they use mathematical language (terminology, symbols, conventions and representations) and everyday language. They organise and present information in graphical and symbolic form, and describe and represent mathematical models.

4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.

When students evaluate the reasonableness of solutions, they interpret their mathematical results in the context of the situation and reflect on whether the problem has been solved. They verify results by using estimation skills and checking calculations, with and without technology. They make an appraisal by assessing implications, strengths and limitations of solutions and/or models, and use this to consider if alternative methods or refinements are required.

5. Justify procedures and decisions.

When students justify procedures and decisions, they explain their mathematical reasoning in detail. They make relationships evident, logically organise mathematical arguments, and provide reasons for choices made and conclusions reached.

6. Solve mathematical problems.

When students solve mathematical problems, they analyse the context of the problem to translate information into mathematical forms. They make decisions about the concepts, techniques and technology to be used and apply these to develop a solution. They develop, refine and use mathematical models, where applicable.

Designing a course of study in Mathematical Methods

Syllabuses are designed for teachers to make professional decisions to tailor curriculum and assessment design and delivery to suit their school context and the goals, aspirations and abilities of their students within the parameters of Queensland's senior phase of learning.

The syllabus is used by teachers to develop curriculum for their school context. The term course of study describes the unique curriculum and assessment that students engage with in each school context. A course of study is the product of a series of decisions made by a school to select, organise and contextualise subject matter, integrate complementary and important learning, and create assessment tasks in accordance with syllabus specifications.

It is encouraged that, where possible, a course of study is designed such that teaching, learning and assessment activities are integrated and enlivened in an authentic setting.

Course structure

Mathematical Methods is a General senior syllabus. It contains four QCAA-developed units from which schools develop their course of study.

Each unit has been developed with a notional time of 55 hours of teaching and learning, including assessment.

Students should complete Unit 1 and Unit 2 before beginning Units 3 and 4. Units 3 and 4 are studied as a pair.

More information about the requirements for administering senior syllabuses is available in the 'Queensland curriculum' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Curriculum

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make curriculum decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

These decisions allow teachers to develop a course of study that is rich, engaging and relevant for their students.

Assessment

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make assessment decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

General senior syllabuses contain assessment specifications and conditions for the assessment instruments that must be implemented with Units 3 and 4. These specifications and conditions ensure comparability, equity and validity in assessment.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

In Unit 1 and Unit 2, schools:

In Units 3 and 4, schools develop three assessments using the assessment specifications and conditions provided in the syllabus.

More information about assessment in senior syllabuses is available in 'The assessment system' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Subject matter

Each unit contains a unit description, unit objectives and subject matter. Subject matter is the body of information, mental procedures and psychomotor procedures (see Marzano & Kendall 2007, 2008) that are necessary for students' learning and engagement with the subject.

Subject matter itself is not the specification of learning experiences but provides the basis for the design of student learning experiences.

Subject matter has a direct relationship with the unit objectives and provides statements of learning that have been constructed in a similar way to objectives.

Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives

The QCAA is committed to reconciliation. As part of its commitment, the QCAA affirms that:

Guidelines about Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives and resources for teaching are available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/k-12-policies/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-perspectives.

Where appropriate, Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives have been embedded in the subject matter.

Complementary skills

Opportunities for the development of complementary skills have been embedded throughout subject matter. These skills, which overlap and interact with syllabus subject matter, are derived from current education, industry and community expectations and encompass the knowledge, skills, capabilities, behaviours and dispositions that will help students live and work successfully in the 21st century.

These complementary skills are:

It is expected that aspects of literacy, numeracy and 21st century skills will be developed by engaging in the learning outlined in this syllabus. Teachers may choose to create additional explicit and intentional opportunities for the development of these skills as they design the course of study.

Additional subject-specific information

Additional subject-specific information has been included to support and inform the development of a course of study.

Assumed knowledge, prior learning or experience

Assumed knowledge refers to the subject matter that teachers can expect students to know prior to beginning this subject. Emphasis is placed on the mastery of content, ensuring key concepts or procedures are learnt fully so they will not need reteaching.

Developing mastery often involves multiple approaches to teaching and conceptualising the same mathematical concept. When students have a good understanding of a key concept or procedure, they are more easily able to make connections to related new subject matter and apply what they already know to new problems.

Subject matter from previous unit/s is assumed for subsequent unit/s.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of assumed knowledge based on the subject matter in the P–10 Australian Curriculum version 9.

Problem-solving and mathematical modelling

A key aspect of learning mathematics is to develop strategic competence; that is, to formulate, represent and solve mathematical problems (Kilpatrick, Swafford & Bradford 2001). As such, problem-solving is a focus of mathematics education research, curriculum and teaching (Sullivan 2011). This focus is not to the exclusion of routine exercises, which are necessary for practising, attaining mastery and being able to respond automatically. But mathematics education in the 21st century goes beyond this to include innovative problems that are complex, unfamiliar and non-routine (Mevarech & Kramarski 2014).

Problem-solving in mathematics can be set in purely mathematical contexts or real-world contexts. When set in the real world, problem-solving in mathematics involves mathematical modelling.

Problem-solving

Problem-solving is required when a task or goal has limiting conditions placed upon it or an obstacle blocking the path to a solution (Marzano & Kendall 2007). It involves:

Problem-solving requires students to explain their mathematical thinking and develop strong conceptual foundations. They must do more than follow set procedures and mimic examples without understanding. Through problem-solving, students will make connections between mathematics topics, across the curriculum and with the real world, and see the value and usefulness of mathematics. Problems may be real-world or abstract, and presented to students as issues, statements or questions that may require them to use primary or secondary data.

Mathematical modelling

Mathematical modelling begins from an assumption that mathematics is everywhere in the world around us — a challenge is to identify where it is present, access it and apply it productively. Models are developed in order to better understand real-world phenomena, to make predictions and answer questions. A mathematical model depicts a situation by expressing relationships using mathematical concepts and language. It refers to the set of simplifying assumptions (such as the relevant variables or the shape of something); the set of assumed relationships between variables; and the resulting representation (such as a formula) that can be used to generate an answer (Stacey 2015).

Mathematical modelling involves:

Through developing and applying mathematical models, students cumulatively become real-world problem-solvers. Ultimately, this means that not only can they productively address problems set by others, but also that they develop the ability to identify and address problems and answer questions that matter to them.

The following section outlines an approach to problem-solving and mathematical modelling.[^1] Problems must be real-world, and can be presented to students as issues, statements or questions that may require them to use primary or secondary data.

[^1]: A wide variety of frameworks for problem-solving and modelling exist in mathematics education literature. The approach outlined here aligns with and is informed by other approaches, such as Polya (1957) in How to Solve It: A new aspect of mathematical method (1957), the Australian Curriculum (ACARA 2015a) Statistical investigation process, the OECD/PISA Mathematics framework (OECD 2015, 2003) and A framework for success in implementing mathematical modelling in the secondary classroom (Stillman et al. 2007). For further reading see Blum et al. (2007); Kaiser et al. (2011); and Stillman et al. (2013).

Figure 1: An approach to problem-solving and mathematical modelling

Once students understand what the problem is asking, they must design a plan to solve the problem. Students translate the problem into a mathematically purposeful representation by first determining the applicable mathematical knowledge that is required to make progress with the problem. Important assumptions, variables and observations are identified and justified, based on the logic of a proposed solution and/or model.

In mathematical modelling, formulating a model involves the process of mathematisation — moving from the real world to the mathematical world.

Students select and apply mathematical knowledge previously learnt to solve the problem. Possible approaches are wide-ranging and include synthesising and refining existing models, and generating and testing hypotheses with primary or secondary data and information, to produce a complete solution.

Solutions can be found using algebraic, graphic, arithmetic and/or numeric methods, with and/or without technology.

Once a possible solution has been achieved, students need to consider the reasonableness of the solution and/or the utility of the model in terms of the problem. They verify their results and evaluate the reasonableness of the solution to the problem in relation to the original issue, statement or question.

This involves exploring the strengths and limitations of the solution and/or model. Where necessary, this will require going back through the process to further refine the solution and/or model. In mathematical modelling, students must check that the output of their model provides a complete solution to the real-world problem it has been designed to address.

This stage emphasises the importance of methodological rigour and the fact that problem-solving and mathematical modelling is not usually linear and involves an iterative process.

The development of solutions and/or models to abstract and real-world problems must be capable of being evaluated and used by others and so need to be communicated and justified clearly and fully. Students communicate findings logically and concisely using mathematical and everyday language. They draw conclusions, discussing the results, strengths and limitations of the solution and/or model. Students could offer further explanation, justification, and/or recommendations, framed in the context of the initial problem.

Approaches to problem-solving and mathematical modelling in the classroom

When teaching problem-solving and mathematical modelling, teachers should consider teaching for and learning through problem-solving and mathematical modelling. When teaching for, students are taught the specific mathematical rules, definitions, procedures, problem-solving strategies and critical elements of the model that are needed to solve a given problem. When learning through, students are presented with problems to solve, but must apply the knowledge and skills they have previously been taught to solve it. By solving these problems, students are able to develop new mathematical understanding and skills. This requires an explicit and connected approach to teaching problem-solving and mathematical modelling that necessitates fluency of critical facts and processes at each step.

The following describes three different approaches to teaching problem-solving and mathematical modelling[^2] along the continua between teaching for and learning through:

Approach Description Teaching for or learning through
Dependent The teacher explicitly demonstrates and teaches the concepts and techniques required to solve the problem, and/or develop a mathematical model. This usually involves students solving (stage 2) and evaluating and verifying (stage 3). Teaching for
Guided The teacher influences the choice of concepts and techniques, and/or model that students use to solve the problem. Guidance is provided and all stages of the approach are used. Moving towards learning through
Independent The teacher cedes control and students work independently, choosing their own solution and/or model, and working at their own level of mathematics. The independent approach is the most challenging. Learning through

These approaches are not mutually exclusive. An independent approach (learning through) might be undertaken as an extension of a dependent or guided activity that students have previously undertaken (teaching for). Students need to have attained the relevant foundational understanding and skills before working independently during a problem-solving and modelling task. This capacity needs to be built over time through the course of study with teachers closely monitoring student progress.

[^2]: Based on Galbraith (1989).

Strategies for retaining and recalling information for assessment

The following practices[^3] can support preparation for senior assessment in Mathematical Methods.

The spacing effect

The spacing effect draws on research about forgetting and learning curves. By recalling and revisiting information at intervals, rather than at the end of a study cycle, students remember a greater percentage of the information with a higher level of accuracy. Exposing students to information and materials numerous times over multiple spaced intervals solidifies long-term memory, positively affecting retention and recall.

Teachers should plan teaching and learning sequences that allow time to revisit previously taught information and skills at several intervals. These repeated learning opportunities also provide opportunities for teachers to provide formative feedback to students.

The retrieval effect

The retrieval effect helps students to practise remembering through quick, regular, low-stakes questioning or quizzes that exercise their memories and develop their ability to engage in the deliberate act of recalling information. This has been shown to be more effective at developing long-term memories than activities that require students to search through notes or other resources.

Students may see an inability to remember as an obstacle, but they should be encouraged to understand that this is an opportunity for learning to take place. By trying to recall information, students exercise or strengthen their memory and may also identify gaps in their learning. The more difficult the retrieval practice, the better it can be for long-term learning.

Interleaving

Interleaving involves interspersing the concepts, categories, skills or types of questions that students focus on in class or revision. This is in contrast to blocking, in which these elements are grouped together in a block of time. For example, for concepts A, B and C:

Studies have found that interleaving in instruction or revision produces better long-term recall of subject matter. Interleaving also ensures that spacing occurs, as instances of practice are spread out over time.

Additionally, because exposure to one concept is interleaved with exposure to another, students have more opportunities to distinguish between related concepts. This highlighting of differences may explain why studies have found that interleaving enhances inductive learning, where participants use exemplars to develop an understanding of broader concepts or categories. Spacing without interleaving does not appear to benefit this type of learning.

Interleaving can seem counterintuitive — even in studies where interleaving enhanced learning, participants often felt that they had learnt more with blocked study. Despite this, their performance in testing indicated greater learning through the interleaving approach.

[^3]: Based on Agarwal, Roediger, McDaniel & McDermott (2020); Birnbaum, Kornell, Ligon Bjork & Bjork (2013); Carpenter & Agarwal (2020); Chen, Paas & Sweller (2021); Ebbinghaus (1885); Rohrer (2012); Taylor & Rohrer (2010).

Reporting

General information about determining and reporting results for senior syllabuses is provided in the 'Determining and reporting results' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Reporting standards

Reporting standards are summary statements that describe typical performance at each of the five levels (A–E).

A

The student recalls, uses and communicates comprehensive mathematical knowledge drawn from Algebra, Functions, relations and their graphs, Calculus and Statistics in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations.

The student evaluates the reasonableness of solutions, justifies procedures and decisions, and solves mathematical problems in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations.

B

The student recalls, uses and communicates thorough mathematical knowledge drawn from Algebra, Functions, relations and their graphs, Calculus and Statistics in simple familiar and complex familiar situations.

The student evaluates the reasonableness of solutions, justifies procedures and decisions, and solves mathematical problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations.

C

The student recalls, uses and communicates mathematical knowledge drawn from Algebra, Functions, relations and their graphs, Calculus and Statistics in simple familiar situations.

The student evaluates the reasonableness of solutions, justifies procedures and decisions, and solves mathematical problems in simple familiar situations.

D

The student recalls, uses and communicates partial mathematical knowledge drawn from Algebra, Functions, relations and their graphs, Calculus and Statistics in simple familiar situations.

The student sometimes evaluates the reasonableness of solutions, sometimes justifies procedures and decisions, and solves some mathematical problems in simple familiar situations.

E

The student recalls, uses and communicates isolated mathematical knowledge drawn from Algebra, Functions, relations and their graphs, Calculus and Statistics in simple familiar situations.

The student rarely evaluates the reasonableness of solutions, and infrequently justifies procedures and decisions in simple familiar situations.

Determining and reporting results

Unit 1 and Unit 2

Schools make judgments on individual assessment instruments using a method determined by the school. They may use the reporting standards or develop an instrument-specific marking guide (ISMG). Marks are not required for determining a unit result for reporting to the QCAA.

The unit assessment program comprises the assessment instrument/s designed by the school to allow the students to demonstrate the unit objectives. The unit judgment of A–E is made using reporting standards.

Schools report student results for Unit 1 and Unit 2 to the QCAA as satisfactory (S) or unsatisfactory (U). Where appropriate, schools may also report a not rated (NR).

Units 3 and 4

Schools mark each of the three internal assessment instruments implemented in Units 3 and 4 using ISMGs.

Schools report a provisional mark by criterion to the QCAA for each internal assessment.

Once confirmed by the QCAA, these results will be combined with the result of the external assessment developed and marked by the QCAA.

The QCAA uses these results to determine each student's subject result as a mark out of 100 and as an A–E.

Units

Unit 1: Surds, algebra, functions and probability

In Unit 1, students will develop mathematical understandings and skills to solve problems relating to:

Working with surds provides techniques that are useful in several areas of mathematics. Relationships between variable quantities are reviewed and these are used to introduce the key concepts of a function and its graph. The algebraic expansion of powers of a binomial are found using the binomial theorem. Quadratic, cubic and reciprocal functions are studied. Graphs of relations are introduced. Trigonometric functions, graphs and equations are studied. The study of inferential statistics begins in this unit with a review of the fundamentals of probability and the introduction of the concepts of conditional probability and independence.

Unit objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Surds and quadratic functions

Sub-topic: Surds (4 hours)
Sub-topic: Quadratic functions (7 hours)

Topic 2: Binomial expansion and cubic functions

Sub-topic: Binomial expansion (3 hours)
Sub-topic: Cubic functions (9 hours)

Topic 3: Functions and relations

Sub-topic: Introduction to functions and relations (5 hours)
Sub-topic: Graphs of relations (4 hours)
Sub-topic: Reciprocal functions (2 hours)

Topic 4: Trigonometric functions

Sub-topic: Circular measure and radian measure (2 hours)
Sub-topic: Introduction to trigonometric functions (8 hours)

Topic 5: Probability

Sub-topic: Language of events and sets (4 hours)
Sub-topic: Conditional probability and independence (7 hours)

Unit 2: Calculus and further functions

In Unit 2, students will develop mathematical understandings and skills to solve problems relating to:

Exponential graphs are examined and their applications in a wide range of settings are explored. Logarithms are introduced. Logarithmic laws and definitions are developed and used, logarithmic functions are explored graphically and algebraically and the applications of logarithmic functions are studied.

Rates and average rates of change are also introduced, followed by the key concept of the derivative as an 'instantaneous rate of change'. These concepts are reinforced numerically, geometrically as gradients of chords and tangents, and algebraically.

Calculus is developed to study the derivatives of power and polynomial functions, with applications of the derivative to curve sketching, calculating gradients, finding equations of tangents and normals (a link to linear functions is assumed knowledge), determining instantaneous rates of change of displacements as velocities and solving problems using differentiation rules.

Unit objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Exponential functions

Sub-topic: Indices and index laws (4 hours)
Sub-topic: Introduction to exponential functions (6 hours)

Topic 2: Logarithms and logarithmic functions

Sub-topic: Logarithms and logarithmic laws (5 hours)
Sub-topic: Logarithmic functions (7 hours)

Topic 3: Introduction to differential calculus

Sub-topic: Rates of change and the concept of derivatives (10 hours)

Topic 4: Applications of differential calculus

Sub-topic: Graphical applications of derivatives (12 hours)

Topic 5: Further differentiation

Sub-topic: Differentiation rules (11 hours)

Unit 3: Further calculus and introduction to statistics

In Unit 3, students will develop mathematical understandings and skills to solve problems relating to:

The study of calculus continues with the derivatives of exponential, logarithmic and trigonometric functions and their applications, together with some differentiation techniques and applications to optimisation problems and graph sketching. Integration, both as a process that reverses differentiation and as a way of determining displacement given velocity or acceleration, is introduced.

Discrete random variables are introduced; this supports the development of a framework for statistical inference. Use of discrete random variables in modelling random processes involving chance and variation are studied.

Unit objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Differentiation of exponential and logarithmic functions

Sub-topic: Calculus of exponential functions (6 hours)
Sub-topic: Calculus of logarithmic functions (8 hours)

Topic 2: Differentiation of trigonometric functions and differentiation rules

Sub-topic: Calculus of trigonometric functions (5 hours)
Sub-topic: Differentiation rules (5 hours)

Topic 3: Further applications of differentiation

Sub-topic: The second derivative and applications of differentiation (10 hours)

Topic 4: Introduction to integration

Sub-topic: Anti-differentiation (9 hours)

Topic 5: Discrete random variables

Sub-topic: General discrete random variables (5 hours)
Sub-topic: Bernoulli distributions (2 hours)
Sub-topic: Binomial distributions (5 hours)

Unit 4: Further calculus, trigonometry and statistics

In Unit 4, students will develop mathematical understandings and skills to solve problems relating to:

The study of integral calculus continues with the introduction of the fundamental theorem of calculus and ways of calculating areas under or between curves.

The cosine and sine rules are established and used.

Continuous random variables and their applications are explored and the normal distribution is used in a variety of contexts. Sample and population proportions are explored. The study of statistical inference in this unit is the culmination of earlier work on probability and random variables. The goal of statistical inference is to estimate an unknown parameter associated with a population using a sample of data drawn from that population.

Unit objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Further integration

Sub-topic: Fundamental theorem of calculus and definite integrals (3 hours)
Sub-topic: Applications of integration (8 hours)

Topic 2: Trigonometry

Sub-topic: Cosine and sine rules (10 hours)

Topic 3: Continuous random variables and the normal distribution

Sub-topic: General continuous random variables (6 hours)
Sub-topic: Normal distributions (6 hours)

Topic 4: Sampling and proportions

Sub-topic: Random sampling (3 hours)
Sub-topic: Sample proportions (8 hours)

Topic 5: Interval estimates for proportions

Sub-topic: Confidence intervals for proportions (11 hours)

Assessment

Internal assessment 1: Problem-solving and modelling task (20%)

Students provide a written response to a specific mathematical investigative scenario or context using subject matter from at least one of the topics in Unit 3 or Unit 4. While students may undertake some research, it is not the focus of this task.

Assessment objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Specifications

This assessment may draw on subject matter from Units 3 and 4.

This task requires students to:

Conditions

Response requirements

Written: up to 10 A4 pages, up to 2000 words

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Formulate 1, 5 4
Solve 1, 2, 6 7
Evaluate 4, 5 5
Communicate 3, 5 4
Total marks 20

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA1)

Formulate

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• justified statements of important assumptions
• justified statements of important observations
• justified mathematical translation of important aspects of the task
3–4
• statement of a relevant assumption
• statement of a relevant observation
• mathematical translation of an aspect of the task.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Solve

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• accurate use of mathematical knowledge for important aspects of the task
• efficient use of technology
• a complete solution
6–7
• use of mathematical knowledge for an important aspect of the task
• use of technology
• substantial progress towards a solution
4–5
• simplistic use of mathematical knowledge relevant to the task
• simplistic use of technology
• progress towards a solution
2–3
• inappropriate use of mathematical knowledge or technology. 1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Evaluate

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• verified results
• justified statements about the reasonableness of the solution by considering the assumptions
• justified statements about the reasonableness of the solution by considering the observations
• justified statements of relevant strengths of the solution
• justified statements of relevant limitations of the solution
4–5
• a verified result
• statement about the reasonableness of the solution by considering an assumption or observation
• statement of a relevant strength or relevant limitation of the solution
2–3
• statement about the reasonableness of a result or the solution
• statement of a strength or limitation.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Communicate

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• correct use of appropriate mathematical language
• logical organisation of the response, which can be read independently of the task sheet
• justification of decisions using mathematical reasoning
3–4
• use of some appropriate mathematical language
• adequate organisation of the response
• statement of a relevant decision.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 2: Examination — short response (15%)

Assessment objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Specifications

The teacher provides an examination that:

Question specifications

The examination must be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Degree of difficulty Mark allocation (± 2%) Objectives In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 1, 2 and 3. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
  - in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains of mathematics; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
  - in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 4, 5 and 6. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains of mathematics; and
• all the information to solve the problem is not immediately identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is not clear from the way the problem is posed; and
  - in a context in which students have had limited prior experience.

Conditions

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Foundational knowledge and problem-solving 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 15
Total marks 15

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA2)

Foundational knowledge and problem-solving Cut-off Marks
Consistently correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; authoritative and accurate communication of mathematical knowledge; astute evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to correctly justify procedures and decisions; and fluent application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >93% 15
Consistently correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; authoritative and accurate communication of mathematical knowledge; astute evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to correctly justify procedures and decisions; and fluent application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >87% 14
Correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; clear communication of mathematical knowledge; considered evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and proficient application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >80% 13
Correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; clear communication of mathematical knowledge; considered evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and proficient application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >73% 12
Thorough recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations >67% 11
Thorough recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations >60% 10
Recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of some solutions; some use of mathematical reasoning; and some application of mathematical knowledge to make progress towards solving problems in simple familiar situations >53% 9
Recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of some solutions; some use of mathematical reasoning; and some application of mathematical knowledge to make progress towards solving problems in simple familiar situations >47% 8
Some recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of mathematical knowledge >40% 7
Some recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of mathematical knowledge >33% 6
Infrequent recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of some mathematical knowledge >27% 5
Infrequent recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of some mathematical knowledge >20% 4
Isolated recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and partial communication of rudimentary mathematical knowledge >13% 3
Isolated recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and partial communication of rudimentary mathematical knowledge >7% 2
Isolated and inaccurate recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and disjointed and unclear communication of mathematical knowledge. >0% 1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 3: Examination — short response (15%)

Assessment objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Specifications

The teacher provides an examination that:

Question specifications

The examination must be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Degree of difficulty Mark allocation (± 2%) Objectives In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 1, 2 and 3. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
  - in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains of mathematics; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
  - in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 4, 5 and 6. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains of mathematics; and
• all the information to solve the problem is not immediately identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is not clear from the way the problem is posed; and
  - in a context in which students have had limited prior experience.

Conditions

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Foundational knowledge and problem-solving 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 15
Total marks 15

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA3)

Foundational knowledge and problem-solving Cut-off Marks
Consistently correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; authoritative and accurate communication of mathematical knowledge; astute evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to correctly justify procedures and decisions; and fluent application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >93% 15
Consistently correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; authoritative and accurate communication of mathematical knowledge; astute evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to correctly justify procedures and decisions; and fluent application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >87% 14
Correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; clear communication of mathematical knowledge; considered evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and proficient application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >80% 13
Correct recall and use of mathematical knowledge; clear communication of mathematical knowledge; considered evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and proficient application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations >73% 12
Thorough recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations >67% 11
Thorough recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of solutions; use of mathematical reasoning to justify procedures and decisions; and application of mathematical knowledge to solve problems in simple familiar and complex familiar situations >60% 10
Recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of some solutions; some use of mathematical reasoning; and some application of mathematical knowledge to make progress towards solving problems in simple familiar situations >53% 9
Recall and use of mathematical knowledge; communication of mathematical knowledge; evaluation of the reasonableness of some solutions; some use of mathematical reasoning; and some application of mathematical knowledge to make progress towards solving problems in simple familiar situations >47% 8
Some recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of mathematical knowledge >40% 7
Some recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of mathematical knowledge >33% 6
Infrequent recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of some mathematical knowledge >27% 5
Infrequent recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and basic communication of some mathematical knowledge >20% 4
Isolated recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and partial communication of rudimentary mathematical knowledge >13% 3
Isolated recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and partial communication of rudimentary mathematical knowledge >7% 2
Isolated and inaccurate recall and use of mathematical knowledge; and disjointed and unclear communication of mathematical knowledge. >0% 1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

External assessment: Examination — combination response (50%)

External assessment is developed and marked by the QCAA. The external assessment in Mathematical Methods is common to all schools and administered under the same conditions, at the same time, on the same day.

Assessment objectives

  1. Recall mathematical knowledge.
  2. Use mathematical knowledge.
  3. Communicate mathematical knowledge.
  4. Evaluate the reasonableness of solutions.
  5. Justify procedures and decisions.
  6. Solve mathematical problems.

Specifications

This examination:

Paper 1:

Paper 2:

Question specifications

The examination will be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Degree of difficulty Mark allocation (± 2%) Objectives In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 1, 2 and 3. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
  - in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains of mathematics; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is clear from the way the problem is posed, or
  - in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 4, 5 and 6. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with subject matter within and/or across the domains of mathematics; and
• all the information to solve the problem is not immediately identifiable, that is
  - the required procedure is not clear from the way the problem is posed; and
  - in a context in which students have had limited prior experience.

Conditions

Paper 1:

Paper 2:

Glossary

The syllabus glossary is available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/common/snr_glossary_cognitive_verbs.pdf.

References

Agarwal, PK, Roediger, HL, McDaniel, MA & McDermott, KB 2020, 'How to use retrieval practice to improve learning', Retrieval Practice, http://pdf.retrievalpractice.org/RetrievalPracticeGuide.pdf. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) 2015, Australian Curriculum Senior Secondary Curriculum: Mathematical Methods, version 7.5, v7-5.australiancurriculum.edu.au/seniorsecondary/mathematics/mathematical-methods/curriculum/seniorsecondary. ——2015a, Australian Curriculum Senior Secondary Curriculum: General Mathematics Glossary, version 7.5, https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/senior-secondary-curriculum/mathematics/general-mathematics/glossary/. Birnbaum, MS, Kornell, N, Ligon Bjork, E & Bjork, RA 2013, 'Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval', Memory & Cognition, vol. 41, pp. 392–402, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0272-7. Blum, W, Galbraith, PL, Henn, HW & Niss, M 2007, Modelling and applications in mathematics education, Springer, New York. Carpenter, SK & Agarwal, PK 2020, 'How to use spaced retrieval practice to boost learning', Retrieval Practice, http://pdf.retrievalpractice.org/SpacingGuide.pdf. Chen, O, Paas, F, & Sweller, J 2021, 'Spacing and interleaving effects require distinct theoretical bases: A systematic review testing the cognitive load and discriminative-contrast hypotheses', Educational Psychology Review, vol. 33, pp. 1499–1522, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09613-w. Ebbinghaus, H 1885, Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology, HA Ruger & CE Bussenius (trans.), Columbia University, New York, 1913, https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm. Galbraith, P 1989, 'From applications to modelling', in D Blane & M Evans (eds), Mathematical modelling for the senior years, The Mathematical Association of Victoria, Parkville, pp. 78–86. Geiger, V, Faragher, R & Goos, M 2010, 'CAS-enabled technologies as "agents provocateurs" in teaching and learning mathematical modelling in secondary school classrooms', Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 48–68, doi.org/10.1007/BF03217565. Goos, M 2014, 'Mathematics classroom assessment', Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 413–417. Goos, M Geiger, V & Dole, S 2012, 'Auditing the numeracy demands of the middle years curriculum', Mathematics Education: Expanding horizons — Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Singapore, pp. 314–321. Grønmo, LS, Lindquist, M, Arora, A & Mullis, IVS 2015, 'TIMSS 2015 Mathematics Framework', TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks, International Study Center, Boston, timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/frameworks.html#. Kaiser, G, Blum, W, Ferri, RB & Stillman, G (eds) 2011, Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: ICTMA14, International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling, vol. 1, Springer, Vancouver. Kilpatrick, J, Swafford, J, & Bradford, F (eds) 2001, Adding It Up: Helping children learn mathematics, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2008, Designing and Assessing Educational Objectives: Applying the new taxonomy, Corwin Press, USA. ——2007, The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2nd edn, Corwin Press, USA. Mevarech, Z, & Kramarski, B 2014, Critical Maths for Innovative Societies: The role of metacognitive pedagogies, OECD Publishing, Paris. Norton, S, & O'Connor, BR 2016, Literature review for senior syllabus revisions: Mathematics, Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority, Brisbane. OECD 2015, PISA 2015 Mathematics Framework, OECD Publishing, Paris. ——2012, 'Numeracy', in Literacy, Numeracy and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments — Framework for the OECD Survey of Adult Skills, OECD, doi.org/10.1787/9789264128859-en. ——2003, PISA 2003 Assessment Framework, OECD Publishing, Paris. Polya, G 1957, How to Solve It: A new aspect of mathematical method, 2nd edn, Princeton University Press, NJ. Rohrer, D 2012, 'Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts', Educational Psychology Review, vol. 24, pp. 355–367, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9201-3. Shafer, MC & Foster, S 1997, 'What's up on the web: The changing face of assessment', Principled Practice in Mathematics and Science Education: Fall 1997, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–8, ncisla.wceruw.org/publications/index.html#newsletters. Stacey, K. 2015, 'The Real World and the Mathematical World', in Stacey, K & Turner, R (eds), Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA experience, Springer, Switzerland, pp. 57–84, doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_3. Steen, LA 2001, 'The case for quantitative literacy', in Mathematics and Democracy: The case for quantitative literacy, National Council on Education and the Disciplines, Princeton, NJ, pp. 1–22. Stillman, G, Galbraith, P, Brown, J & Edwards, I 2007, 'A framework for success in implementing mathematical modelling in the secondary classroom', Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice, vol. 2, pp. 688–697. Stillman, G, Kaiser, G, Blum, W and Brown, JP (eds) 2013, Teaching Mathematical Modelling: Connecting to research and practice, Springer, Vancouver. Sullivan, P 2011, Teaching Mathematics: Using research-informed strategies, ACER Press, Camberwell, Vic. Taylor, K & Rohrer, D 2010, 'The effects of interleaved practice', Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, issue 6, pp. 837–848, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/acp.1598. Verhage, H, & de Lange, J 1997, 'Mathematics education and assessment', Pythagoras, vol. 42, pp. 14–20. Webb, DC 2009, 'Designing professional development for assessment', Educational Designer, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–26, www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue2/article6/. White, P, Sullivan, P, Warren, E & Quinlan, C 2000, 'To investigate or not to investigate? The use of content-specific open-ended tasks', The Australian Mathematics Teacher, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 6–9, aamt.edu.au/Journals/Journals-Index/The-Australian-Mathematics-Teacher/AMT-56-2-6.

Version history

Version Date of change Information
1.0 January 2024 Released for familiarisation and planning (with implementation starting in 2025)
1.1 July 2024 Released for implementation with minor updates
1.2 October 2024 ISBN removed and minor updates
1.3 January 2026 File metadata changes to support new Syllabuses application functionality