Original source · Published March 2026 · Updated March 2026

Course overview

Rationale

Technologies have been an integral part of society for as long as humans have had the desire to create solutions to improve their own and others' quality of life. Technologies have an impact on people and societies by transforming, restoring and sustaining the world in which we live. Australia needs enterprising and innovative individuals with the ability to make discerning decisions concerning the development, use and impact of technologies. When developing technologies, these individuals need to be able to work independently and collaboratively to solve complex, open-ended problems. Subjects in the Technologies learning area prepare students to be effective problem-solvers as they learn about and work with contemporary and emerging technologies.

The problem-solving process in Engineering involves the practical application of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) knowledge to develop sustainable products, processes and services. Engineers use their technical and social knowledge to solve problems in ways that meet the needs of today's individuals, communities, businesses and environments, without compromising the potential needs of future generations. Students who study Engineering develop technical knowledge and problem-solving skills that enable them to respond to and manage ongoing technological and societal change.

Engineering includes the study of mechanics, materials science and control technologies through real-world engineering contexts where students engage in problem-based learning. Students learn to explore complex, open-ended problems and develop engineered solutions. They recognise and describe engineering problems, determine success criteria, develop and communicate ideas and propose, generate, evaluate and refine real-world-related solutions. Students justify their decision-making and acknowledge the societal, economic and environmental sustainability of their engineered solutions. The problem-based learning framework in Engineering encourages students to become self-directed learners and develop beneficial collaboration and management skills.

Engineering provides students with an opportunity to experience, first-hand and in a practical way, the exciting and dynamic work of real-world engineers. Students learn transferrable 21st century skills that support their life aspirations, including critical thinking, creative thinking, communication, collaboration and teamwork, personal and social skills, and information & communication technologies (ICT) skills. The study of Engineering inspires students to become adaptable and resilient. They appreciate the engineer's ability to confidently and proficiently generate solutions that improve the quality of people's lives in an increasingly complex and dynamic technological world.

Syllabus objectives

The syllabus objectives outline what students have the opportunity to learn.

1. Recognise and describe engineering problems, knowledge, concepts and principles.

When students recognise engineering problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, they identify or recall related engineering technology knowledge, mechanics, materials science and control technologies concepts and principles. When students describe they give an account of the characteristics or features of problems, knowledge, concepts and principles.

2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions.

When students symbolise, they represent idea and solution development in sketches, drawings, diagrams, models, tables and/or schemas. When students explain, they use knowledge, understanding and reasoning to make ideas, solutions and interrelationships plain or clear by describing them in more detail or revealing relevant facts.

3. Analyse problems and information.

When students analyse problems and information, they research and investigate to explain and interpret, for the purpose of finding meaning or relationships. They determine the reasonableness of information and ascertain patterns, similarities and differences in order to identify elements, components and features, and their relationship to the structure of problems.

4. Determine success criteria for engineering problems.

When students determine success criteria for engineering problems, they establish, conclude or ascertain solution needs and constraints, or requirements after consideration of elements, components and features, and their relationship to the structure of problems.

5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible solutions.

When students synthesise information and ideas to propose possible solutions, they combine and integrate information and ideas, and resolve uncertainties using knowledge of technology, mechanics, materials science and control technologies, and knowledge gained through research, investigation and testing to create new understanding.

6. Generate prototype solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of solutions.

When students generate prototype solutions, they produce a trial solution, that when tested, provides data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution.

7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.

When students evaluate, they appraise ideas and solutions by weighing up or assessing strengths, implications and limitations against success criteria. When students refine solutions, they modify to make improvements relative to success criteria. They use data, provided by testing, to evaluate and refine solutions. When students make justified recommendations, they put forward a point of view or suggestion with supporting evidence to make modifications.

8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions for particular purposes and contexts.

When students make decisions about mode-appropriate features and conventions, they use written and visual features to express meaning for particular purposes in a range of contexts. Written communication includes language conventions, specific vocabulary and language features such as annotations, paragraphs, and sentences. Visual communication includes photographs, sketches, drawings and diagrams. Students use referencing conventions to practise ethical scholarship for particular purposes.

Designing a course of study in Engineering

Syllabuses are designed for teachers to make professional decisions to tailor curriculum and assessment design and delivery to suit their school context and the goals, aspirations and abilities of their students within the parameters of Queensland's senior phase of learning.

The syllabus is used by teachers to develop curriculum for their school context. The term course of study describes the unique curriculum and assessment that students engage with in each school context. A course of study is the product of a series of decisions made by a school to select, organise and contextualise subject matter, integrate complementary and important learning, and create assessment tasks in accordance with syllabus specifications.

It is encouraged that, where possible, a course of study is designed such that teaching, learning and assessment activities are integrated and enlivened in an authentic setting.

Course structure

Engineering is a General senior syllabus. It contains four QCAA-developed units from which schools develop their course of study.

Each unit has been developed with a notional time of 55 hours of teaching and learning, including assessment.

Students should complete Unit 1 and Unit 2 before beginning Units 3 and 4. Units 3 and 4 are studied as a pair.

More information about the requirements for administering senior syllabuses is available in the 'Queensland curriculum' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Curriculum

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make curriculum decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

These decisions allow teachers to develop a course of study that is rich, engaging and relevant for their students.

Assessment

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make assessment decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

General senior syllabuses contain assessment specifications and conditions for the assessment instruments that must be implemented with Units 3 and 4. These specifications and conditions ensure comparability, equity and validity in assessment.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

In Unit 1 and Unit 2, schools:

In Units 3 and 4, schools develop three assessments using the assessment specifications and conditions provided in the syllabus.

More information about assessment in senior syllabuses is available in 'The assessment system' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Subject matter

Each unit contains a unit description, unit objectives and subject matter. Subject matter is the body of information, mental procedures and psychomotor procedures (see Marzano & Kendall 2007, 2008) that are necessary for students' learning and engagement with the subject. Subject matter itself is not the specification of learning experiences but provides the basis for the design of student learning experiences.

Subject matter has a direct relationship with the unit objectives and provides statements of learning that have been constructed in a similar way to objectives.

Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives

The QCAA is committed to reconciliation. As part of its commitment, the QCAA affirms that:

Guidelines about Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives and resources for teaching are available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/k-12-policies/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-perspectives.

Where appropriate, Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives have been embedded in the subject matter.

Complementary skills

Opportunities for the development of complementary skills have been embedded throughout subject matter. These skills, which overlap and interact with syllabus subject matter, are derived from current education, industry and community expectations and encompass the knowledge, skills, capabilities, behaviours and dispositions that will help students live and work successfully in the 21st century.

These complementary skills are:

It is expected that aspects of literacy, numeracy and 21st century skills will be developed by engaging in the learning outlined in this syllabus. Teachers may choose to create additional explicit and intentional opportunities for the development of these skills as they design the course of study.

Additional subject-specific information

Additional subject-specific information has been included to support and inform the development of a course of study.

Procedural knowledge

This procedural knowledge must be integrated into the subject matter and assessment of all units. Each of the units in Engineering has a particular context with associated knowledge and skills. The units are structured to provide students with the opportunity to apply the problem-solving process in Engineering (see Figure 1) and associated knowledge and skills through each of the four units.

Figure 1: The problem-solving process in Engineering

The problem-solving process in Engineering is iterative and includes the four phases of Explore, Develop, Generate, and Evaluate and refine. Evaluate and refine is a critical phase as it involves making decisions about where and how the process will proceed relative to the other phases. The decisions students make about moving within and between the various phases reflect the iterative nature of the process.

Explore phase

The explore phase involves students investigating needs and constraints, or requirements to analyse and understand an engineering problem and its relationship to existing engineered solutions.

To explore the problem, students:

Develop phase

The develop phase involves students creating new understanding to propose possible solutions. Students evaluate ideas and engineered solutions against success criteria and data.

To develop ideas, students:

Generate phase

The generate phase involves students producing a prototype that, when tested, provides data to determine the feasibility of the real-world-related solution.

To generate solutions, students:

Evaluate and refine phase

The evaluate and refine phase involves students appraising ideas and solutions against success criteria and data to make modifications and improvements. Evaluation occurs throughout each phase of the problem-solving process to refine ideas and possible solutions in response to success criteria and data.

To evaluate and refine, students:

Reporting

General information about determining and reporting results for senior syllabuses is provided in the 'Determining and reporting results' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Reporting standards

Reporting standards are summary statements that describe typical performance at each of the five levels (A–E).

A

The student, for a range of engineering situations, demonstrates accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of engineering problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and solutions.

The student demonstrates insightful analysis of problems and relevant information, and astute determination of essential success criteria.

The student demonstrates coherent and logical synthesis of relevant information and ideas to propose possible solutions; critical evaluation of ideas and solutions using success criteria and discerning refinement of solutions to make astute recommendations justified by evidence; proficient generation of prototype solutions to provide valid data to critically determine the feasibility of the real-world solution; discerning decision-making about, and proficient use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions for purpose.

B

The student, for a range of engineering situations, demonstrates accurate recognition and effective description of engineering problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; effective symbolisation and considered explanation of ideas and solutions.

The student demonstrates considered analysis of problems and relevant information, and reasoned determination of effective success criteria.

The student demonstrates logical synthesis of relevant information and ideas to propose possible solutions; reasoned evaluation of ideas and solutions using success criteria and effective refinement of solutions to make considered recommendations justified by evidence; effective generation of prototype solutions to provide valid data to effectively determine the feasibility of the real-world solution; effective decision-making about, and fluent use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions for purpose.

C

The student, for a range of engineering situations, demonstrates appropriate recognition and description of engineering problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions.

The student demonstrates appropriate analysis of problems and information, and logical determination of appropriate success criteria.

The student demonstrates simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions; feasible evaluation of ideas and solutions using some success criteria and adequate refinement of solutions to make fundamental recommendations justified by evidence; adequate generation of prototype solutions to provide relevant data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution; appropriate decision-making about, and use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions for purpose.

D

The student, for a range of engineering situations, demonstrates inconsistent recognition and superficial description of aspects of problems, concepts or principles; inconsistent symbolisation or superficial explanation of aspects of ideas or solutions.

The student demonstrates superficial analysis of problems and partial information, and reasonable determination of some success criteria.

The student demonstrates rudimentary synthesis of partial information or ideas to propose solutions; superficial evaluation of ideas or solutions using some success criteria to make elementary recommendations; partial generation of prototype solutions to provide elements of data to partially determine the feasibility of the real-world solution; inconsistent decision-making about, and inconsistent use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate.

E

The student, for a range of engineering situations, demonstrates recognition of aspects of problems, concepts or principles, and disjointed symbolisation or explanation of aspects of ideas or solutions.

The student demonstrates the making of statements about problems, concepts or principles.

The student demonstrates unclear combinations of information or ideas; identification of a change to an idea or a solution; generation of elements of prototype solutions; unclear or fragmented use of mode-appropriate features, language and conventions.

Determining and reporting results

Unit 1 and Unit 2

Schools make judgments on individual assessment instruments using a method determined by the school. They may use the reporting standards or develop an instrument-specific marking guide (ISMG). Marks are not required for determining a unit result for reporting to the QCAA.

The unit assessment program comprises the assessment instrument/s designed by the school to allow the students to demonstrate the unit objectives. The unit judgment of A–E is made using reporting standards.

Schools report student results for Unit 1 and Unit 2 to the QCAA as satisfactory (S) or unsatisfactory (U). Where appropriate, schools may also report a not rated (NR).

Units 3 and 4

Schools mark each of the three internal assessment instruments implemented in Units 3 and 4 using ISMGs.

Schools report a provisional mark by criterion to the QCAA for each internal assessment.

Once confirmed by the QCAA, these results will be combined with the result of the external assessment developed and marked by the QCAA.

The QCAA uses these results to determine each student's subject result as a mark out of 100 and as an A–E.

Units

Unit 1: Engineering fundamentals

In Unit 1, students learn about engineering's role in solving global and local societal problems in order to improve the human condition. They learn how to use their knowledge of fundamental mechanics and materials science concepts and principles to solve problems using the problem-solving process in Engineering in ways that meet human needs while considering the economic, social, ethical, legal and environmental impacts of their solutions. Students explore the history of engineering to gain an appreciation for the role played by engineering in the shaping of contemporary and future societies. Students engage in practical engineering activities to learn that engineering is an applied practical discipline that uses science and mathematics concepts and principles to solve real-world-related problems. Students are introduced to engineering drawings that communicate ideas to a technical and non-technical audience. Students participate in a range of individual and collaborative group activities, including those associated with material and process testing, analysis of the forces acting on basic structures, and problem-solving.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe a structural problem, engineering technology knowledge, and mechanics and materials science concepts and principles in relation to engineering fundamentals and society.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions in relation to engineering fundamentals and society.
  3. Analyse a structural problem, and information in relation to engineering fundamentals and society.
  4. Determine success criteria for a structural problem.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose a possible structural solution.
  6. Generate a structural prototype solution to provide data to determine the feasibility of real-world solutions.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Engineering in society

Topic 2: Engineering communication

Topic 3: Introduction to engineering mechanics

Quantity (symbol) SI unit (symbol)
acceleration (a) metre per second squared (m/s²)
area (A) square metre (m²)
density or mass density (ρ) kilogram per cubic metre (kg/m³)
displacement (s) metres (m)
electric current (I) ampere (A)
electric potential (V) volt (V)
electric resistance (R) ohm (Ω)
force (F) newton (N)
modulus of elasticity or Young's modulus (E) pascal (Pa)
moment of force or torque (M) newton metre (N m)
power (P) watt (W)
velocity (υ) metres per second (m/s)
stress (σ) pascal (Pa)
volume (V) cubic metre (m³)
work (W), energy (E) joule (J)

Topic 4: Introduction to engineering materials

Unit 2: Emerging technologies

In Unit 2, students explore the needs of contemporary and future societies. Students investigate the emergence of new materials, processes and machines developed to solve problems in relation to rapidly evolving needs. This unit builds on the knowledge gained in the previous unit and reinforces engineering's role in solving global and local societal problems in order to improve the human condition. Students use their knowledge of mechanics, materials science and control technologies to solve problems using the problem-solving process in Engineering in ways that meet contemporary and future human needs while considering the social, economic, ethical, legal and environmental impacts of their solutions. Students investigate new and emerging technologies in relation to engineering fields including biomedical, aerospace, energy and electrical. They engage in practical engineering activities using the knowledge gained in this unit to solve real-world-related problems. Students participate in a range of individual and collaborative group activities including those associated with advanced materials, health, renewable energy, autonomous vehicles and robotics.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe emerging societal problems, engineering technology knowledge, and mechanics, materials science and control technologies concepts and principles, in relation to emerging technologies.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions in relation to emerging technologies.
  3. Analyse emerging societal problems, and information in relation to emerging technologies.
  4. Determine success criteria for emerging societal problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible emerging societal solutions.
  6. Generate emerging societal prototype solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Emerging needs in society

Topic 2: Emerging processes, machinery and automation

Topic 3: Emerging materials

Unit 3: Civil structures

In Unit 3, students learn about engineering's role in solving global and local societal problems to improve the human condition using the problem-solving process in Engineering. Students investigate civil structures to examine the benefits and the social and environmental consequences of their construction and use. Students engage in practical engineering activities to learn that engineering is an applied practical discipline that uses science and mathematics concepts and principles to solve real-world-related problems. Students participate in a range of individual and collaborative group activities, including those associated with material and process testing, and analysis of the forces acting on structures. Students investigate the difficulties involved in engineering solutions for communities where environmental extremes must be considered, including those associated with intense cold and heat, storms, drought or flood.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe structural problems, engineering technology knowledge, and mechanics and materials science concepts and principles, in relation to structures.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions in relation to structures.
  3. Analyse structural problems, and information in relation to structures.
  4. Determine success criteria for structural problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible structural solutions.
  6. Generate structural prototype solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Civil structures in society

Topic 2: Civil structures and forces

Topic 3: Civil engineering materials

Unit 4: Machines and mechanisms

In Unit 4, students extend their knowledge of Units 1, 2 and 3 to develop an understanding of dynamics through machines and mechanisms, including the uniformly accelerated motion of objects in one dimension, apparent weight, and motion on an inclined plane. They examine the effect of frictional forces on the motion of objects. Students investigate the functional requirements of machines and mechanisms and establish a working knowledge of their operation in real-world contexts. They differentiate between the properties of materials used in the manufacture of machines and mechanisms in engineering fields such as mechanical, electrical, biomedical and mechatronics.

In this culminating unit, students apply the knowledge gained in previous units to solve problems using the problem-solving process in Engineering in ways that meet human needs while considering the social, ethical, economic and environmental impacts of their solutions. Students engage in practical engineering activities to learn that engineering is an applied practical discipline that uses science and mathematics concepts and principles to solve real-world-related problems. Students participate in a range of individual and collaborative group activities, including those associated with material and process testing and analysis of the forces acting on machines and mechanisms.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe machine and mechanism problems, engineering technology knowledge, and mechanics, materials science and control technologies concepts and principles in relation to machines and mechanisms.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions in relation to machines and mechanisms.
  3. Analyse machine and mechanism problems, and information in relation to machines and mechanisms.
  4. Determine success criteria for machine and mechanism problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible machine and mechanism solutions.
  6. Generate machine and mechanism prototype solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Machines in society

Topic 2: Machines, mechanisms and control

Topic 3: Materials

Assessment

Internal assessment 1: Engineered solution (25%)

Students document the application of the problem-solving process in response to an identified real-world-related problem that requires an engineered solution.

Assessment objectives

  1. Symbolise and explain ideas and a solution in relation to structures.
  2. Determine success criteria for the structural problem.
  3. Synthesise information and ideas to propose a possible structural real-world solution.
  4. Generate a structural prototype solution to provide data to determine the feasibility of the structural real-world solution.
  5. Evaluate and refine ideas and a solution to make justified recommendations.
  6. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of the structural real-world solution.

Specifications

This task requires students to:

It is recommended that this task is designed so that students can develop a response in approximately 10 hours of class time.

Stimulus specifications

The teacher provides an appropriate real-world-related structural problem context.

Conditions

Response requirements

Written and visual (including images, graphs, calculations and diagrams): up to 10 A4 pages, up to 2000 words

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Symbolising and Communicating 2, 8 7
Determining and Generating 4, 6 9
Synthesising and Evaluating 5, 7 9
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA1)

Symbolising and Communicating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and a solution in relation to structures with sketches and drawings, tables and graphs, diagrams and/or schemas
• discerning decision-making about, and proficient use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
6–7
• effective symbolisation and considered explanation of ideas and a solution in relation to structures with sketches and/or drawings, tables and/or graphs, diagrams and/or schemas
• effective decision-making about, and fluent use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
4–5
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of some ideas and a solution in relation to structures with sketches and/or drawings, tables and/or graphs, diagrams and/or schemas
• appropriate decision-making about, and use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, suitable language, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
2–3
• inconsistent symbolisation or superficial explanation of aspects of ideas or a solution in relation to structures
• inconsistent decision-making about, and inconsistent use of written and visual features, grammar and language structures, referencing conventions.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Determining and Generating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• astute determination of essential success criteria for the structural problem
• proficient generation of a structural prototype solution
• provide valid performance data to critically determine the feasibility of the structural real-world solution
8–9
• reasoned determination of effective success criteria for the structural problem
• effective generation of a structural prototype solution
• provide valid performance data to effectively determine the feasibility of the structural real-world solution
6–7
• logical determination of appropriate success criteria for the structural problem
• adequate generation of a structural prototype solution
• provide relevant performance data to determine the feasibility of the structural real-world solution
4–5
• reasonable determination of some success criteria for the structural problem
• partial generation of a structural prototype solution
• provide elements of performance data to partially determine the feasibility of the structural solution
2–3
• statements about some success criteria for the structural problem
• generation of elements of a structural prototype solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Synthesising and Evaluating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• coherent and logical synthesis to propose a possible structural solution of ideas and the relevant engineering mechanics, materials science, technology and research information
• critical evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• discerning refinement of a solution using success criteria to make astute recommendations for enhancements justified by data and research evidence
8–9
• logical synthesis to propose a possible structural solution of ideas and the relevant engineering mechanics, materials science, technology and/or research information
• reasoned evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• effective refinement of a solution using success criteria to make considered recommendations for enhancements justified by data and research evidence
6–7
• simple synthesis to predict a possible structural solution of ideas and engineering mechanics, materials science, technology and/or research information
• feasible evaluation of ideas and a solution using some success criteria
• adequate refinement of a solution using some success criteria to make fundamental recommendations for enhancements justified by data and research evidence
4–5
• rudimentary synthesis to propose a structural solution of partial engineering mechanics, materials science, technology or research information, or ideas
• superficial evaluation of ideas or a solution using some success criteria
• superficial refinements of a solution to make elementary recommendations for enhancements
2–3
• unclear combinations of information or ideas
• identification of a change about an idea or the solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 2: Examination — combination response (25%)

Assessment objectives

  1. Recognise and describe structural problems, engineering technology knowledge, and mechanics and materials science concepts and principles in relation to structures.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions in relation to structures.
  3. Analyse structural problems and information in relation to structures.
  4. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible structural solutions.

Specifications

The teacher provides an examination that includes:

Question specifications

The examination must be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Focus of question Mark allocation (± 2%) Objectives In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically these questions focus on Objectives 1, 3, 5 and can also provide evidence for Objective 2. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
• all of the required information to solve the problem identifiable, that is the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, or is in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to structures; and
• all of the required information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, or is in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically these questions focus on Objectives 3, 5 and can also provide evidence for Objectives 1, 2. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to structures; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is not immediately identifiable, that is the required procedure is not clear from the way the question is posed; and in a context in which students have had limited prior experience

Stimulus specifications

Conditions

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Engineering knowledge and problem-solving 1, 2, 3, 5 25
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA2)

Engineering knowledge and problem-solving Cut-off Marks
Across the full range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and solutions
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>96% 25
Across the full range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and solutions
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>93% 24
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and solutions
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>89% 23
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and solutions
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>86% 22
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas and solutions
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>82% 21
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas and solutions
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>78% 20
In a range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas and solutions
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>75% 19
In a range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas and solutions
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>71% 18
In a range of simple familiar situations and in complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>68% 17
In a range of simple familiar situations and in complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>64% 16
In a range of simple familiar situations and in some complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>60% 15
In a range of simple familiar situations and in some complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>57% 14
In simple familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• inconsistent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>53% 13
In simple familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• inconsistent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>50% 12
In simple familiar situations:
• inconsistent recognition and superficial description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• inconsistent symbolisation and superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>46% 11
In simple familiar situations:
• inconsistent recognition and superficial description of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• inconsistent symbolisation and superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
>42% 10
In some simple familiar situations:
• inconsistent recognition and superficial description of aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose partial possible solutions
>37% 9
In some simple familiar situations:
• inconsistent recognition and superficial description of aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose partial possible solutions
>33% 8
In a limited range of simple familiar situations:
• inconsistent recognition and superficial description of aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of aspects of problems and information
• unclear combination of information and ideas
>28% 7
In a limited range of simple familiar situations:
• inconsistent recognition and superficial description of aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of aspects of problems and information
• unclear combination of information and ideas
>24% 6
Disjointed recognition and statements about aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; identification of a change about ideas, solutions and information; unclear combination of information and ideas >19% 5
Disjointed recognition and statements about aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; identification of a change about ideas, solutions and information; unclear combination of information and ideas >14% 4
Statements about aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; statements about ideas, solutions and information; isolated and unclear combination of information and ideas >10% 3
Statements about aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; statements about ideas, solutions and information; isolated and unclear combination of information and ideas >5% 2
Isolated and unclear statements about aspects of structural problems, knowledge, concepts and principles. >0% 1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 3: Engineered solution (25%)

Students document the application of the problem-solving process in response to an identified real-world-related problem that requires an engineered solution that includes logic control technology.

Assessment objectives

  1. Symbolise and explain ideas and a solution in relation to machines and/or mechanisms.
  2. Determine success criteria for the machine and/or mechanism problem.
  3. Synthesise information and ideas to propose a possible real-world machine and/or mechanism solution.
  4. Generate a machine and/or mechanism prototype solution to provide data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution.
  5. Evaluate and refine ideas and a solution to make justified recommendations for future modifications to a real-world machine and/or mechanism solution.
  6. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of the real-world machine and/or mechanism solution.

Specifications

This task requires students to:

It is recommended that this task is designed so that students can develop a response in approximately 10 hours of class time.

Stimulus specifications

The teacher provides an appropriate real-world-related machine and/or mechanism problem context.

Conditions

Response requirements

Written and visual (including images, graphs, calculations and diagrams): up to 10 A4 pages, up to 2000 words

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Symbolising and Communicating 2, 8 7
Determining and Generating 4, 6 9
Synthesising and Evaluating 5, 7 9
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA3)

Symbolising and Communicating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas and a solution in relation to machines and/or mechanisms with sketches and drawings, tables and graphs, diagrams and/or schemas
• discerning decision-making about, and proficient use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
6–7
• effective symbolisation and considered explanation of ideas and a solution in relation to machines and/or mechanisms with sketches and/or drawings, tables and/or graphs, diagrams and/or schemas
• effective decision-making about, and fluent use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
4–5
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of some ideas and a solution in relation to machines and/or mechanisms with sketches and/or drawings, tables and/or graphs, diagrams and/or schemas
• appropriate decision-making about, and use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, suitable language, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
2–3
• inconsistent symbolisation or superficial explanation of aspects of ideas or a solution in relation to machines and/or mechanisms
• inconsistent decision-making about, and inconsistent use of written and visual features, grammar and language structures, referencing conventions.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Determining and Generating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• astute determination of essential success criteria for the machines and/or mechanisms problem
• proficient generation of a machines and/or mechanisms prototype solution
• provide valid performance data to critically determine the feasibility of the real-world solution
8–9
• reasoned determination of effective success criteria for the machines and/or mechanisms problem
• effective generation of a machines and/or mechanisms prototype solution
• provide valid performance data to effectively determine the feasibility of the real-world solution
6–7
• logical determination of appropriate success criteria for the machines and/or mechanisms problem
• adequate generation of a machines and/or mechanisms prototype solution
• provide relevant performance data to determine the feasibility of the real-world solution
4–5
• reasonable determination of some success criteria for the machine and/or mechanism problem
• partial generation of a machine and/or mechanism prototype solution
• provide elements of performance data to partially determine the feasibility of the solution
2–3
• statements about some success criteria for the machines and/or mechanisms problem
• generation of elements of a machines and/or mechanisms prototype solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Synthesising and Evaluating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• coherent and logical synthesis to propose a possible machine and/or mechanism solution of ideas and the relevant engineering mechanics, materials science, control technologies, technology and research information
• critical evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• discerning refinement of a solution using success criteria to make astute recommendations for modifications justified by data and research evidence
8–9
• logical synthesis to propose a possible machine and/or mechanism solution of ideas and the relevant engineering mechanics, materials science, control technologies, technology and/or research information
• reasoned evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• effective refinement of a solution using success criteria to make considered recommendations for modifications justified by data and research evidence
6–7
• simple synthesis to propose a possible machine and/or mechanism solution of ideas and engineering mechanics, materials science, control technologies, technology and/or research information
• feasible evaluation of ideas and a solution using some success criteria
• adequate refinement of a solution using some success criteria to make fundamental recommendations for modifications justified by data and research evidence
4–5
• rudimentary synthesis to propose a machine and/or mechanism solution of partial engineering mechanics, materials science, control technologies, technology or research information, or ideas
• superficial evaluation of ideas or a solution using some success criteria
• superficial refinements of a solution to make elementary recommendations for modifications
2–3
• unclear combinations of information or ideas
• identification of a change about an idea or the solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

External assessment: Examination — combination response (25%)

External assessment is developed and marked by the QCAA. The external assessment in Engineering is common to all schools and administered under the same conditions, at the same time, on the same day.

Assessment objectives

  1. Recognise and describe machine and mechanism problems, engineering technology knowledge, and mechanics, materials science and control technologies concepts and principles, in relation to machines and mechanisms.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas and solutions in relation to machines and mechanisms.
  3. Analyse machine and mechanism problems, and information in relation to machines and mechanisms.
  4. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible machine and mechanism solutions.

Specifications

This examination:

Question specifications

The examination will be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Focus of question Mark allocation (± 2%) Objective In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically these questions focus on Objectives 1, 3, 5 and can also provide evidence for Objective 2. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements; and
• all of the required information to solve the problem identifiable, that is the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, or is in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to structures; and
• all of the required information to solve the problem is identifiable, that is the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, or is in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically these questions focus on Objectives 3, 5 and can also provide evidence for Objectives 1, 2. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements, such that connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to structures; and
• all of the information to solve the problem is not immediately identifiable, that is the required procedure is not clear from the way the question is posed; and in a context in which students have had limited prior experience

Conditions

Glossary

The syllabus glossary is available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/common/snr_glossary_cognitive_verbs.pdf.

References

Engineers Australia 2022, Code of Ethics, https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/ethics# Ferguson, D 2009, Development of Technology Education in New Zealand Schools 1985–2008, http://technology.tki.org.nz/content/download/244/1153/file/DevelopmentofTechEducation-Sept09- Hibbeler, RC 1986, Engineering Mechanics–Statics, 4th edn, Macmillan, New York. Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2008, Designing and Assessing Educational Objectives: Applying the new taxonomy, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California. Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2007, The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2nd edn, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California. Schlenker, BR 1974, Introduction to Materials Science, SI edn, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, Queensland. Schlenker, BR & McKern, D 1976, Introduction to Engineering Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, Queensland.

Version history

Version Date of change Information
1.0 January 2024 Released for familiarisation and planning (with implementation starting in 2025)
1.1 July 2024 Released for implementation with minor updates
1.2 October 2024 ISBN removed and minor updates
1.3 January 2026 File metadata changes to support new Syllabuses application functionality
1.4 March 2026 For subject matter in Unit 4, Topic 2:
• changed to add formula for 'VR of screws'
• changed to add 'x 100 %' for energy efficiency, electrical power efficiency, and electrical energy efficiency formulas