Original source · Published January 2026 · Updated January 2026

Course overview

Rationale

The QCAA English learning area is made up of five senior secondary subjects: Essential English, English, Literature, English & Literature Extension, and English as an Additional Language. These subjects share common features that include the continuing development of students' knowledge, understanding and skills in listening, speaking, reading, viewing, designing and writing. Differences between the subjects lie in the emphasis on how language and skills are developed and the contexts in which they are applied.

English learning area subjects offer students opportunities to enjoy language and be empowered as functional, purposeful, creative and critical language users who understand how texts can convey and transform personal and cultural perspectives. In a world of rapid cultural, social, economic and technological change, complex demands are placed on citizens to be literate within a variety of modes and mediums. Students are offered opportunities to develop this capacity by drawing on a repertoire of resources to interpret and create texts for personal, cultural, social and aesthetic purposes. They learn how language varies according to context, purpose and audience, content, modes and mediums, and how to use it appropriately and effectively for a variety of purposes. Students have opportunities to engage with diverse texts to help them develop a sense of themselves, their world and their place in it.

The subject Literature focuses on the study of literary texts, developing students as independent, innovative and creative learners and thinkers who appreciate the aesthetic use of language, analyse perspectives and evidence, and challenge ideas and interpretations through the analysis and creation of varied literary texts.

Students have opportunities to engage with language and texts through a range of teaching and learning experiences to foster:

Syllabus objectives

The syllabus objectives outline what students have the opportunity to learn.

1. Use patterns and conventions of genres to achieve particular purposes in cultural contexts and social situations.

When students use patterns and conventions of genres, they apply their knowledge and understanding of them to purposefully construct texts by combining elements to form a coherent whole. In their development of texts, students demonstrate their understanding of genres and their features as influenced by cultural contexts and social situations.

2. Establish and maintain roles of writer/speaker/designer and relationships with audiences.

When students establish and maintain roles of the writer/speaker/designer and relationships with audiences, they set up and sustain a purposeful relationship within a specific context to create a rapport with, or have a particular influence over, the audience. Students demonstrate their understanding of the relationship between context, audience and purpose of a text by making decisions about language, subject matter, register and mode-appropriate features.

3. Create and analyse perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places.

When students create perspectives and representations, they develop points of view and devise textual constructions of concepts, identities, times and places. When students analyse perspectives and representations, they examine in detail how these construct meaning in texts.

4. Make use of and analyse the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions.

When students create texts that make use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and shape meaning, they manipulate these to invite audiences to take up positions. When students analyse, they examine in detail the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and explore how these shape meaning and invite audiences to take up positions.

5. Use aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve purposes and analyse their effects in texts.

When students use aesthetic features and stylistic devices (the aspects of texts that prompt emotional and critical reactions) to achieve purposes, they apply their knowledge and understanding of these to express a thought, feeling, idea or viewpoint to purposefully invite an audience to respond in a particular way. When students analyse the effects of aesthetic features and stylistic devices in texts, they examine the effects of those features and devices in detail to explore how they shape meaning and invite audiences to respond in particular ways.

6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives.

When students select subject matter, they make purposeful choices about the inclusion of material to support perspectives. When students synthesise, they combine elements to construct coherent texts.

7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve particular purposes.

When students organise subject matter, they arrange material systematically and purposefully, e.g. by paragraphing. When students sequence subject matter, they place information in a continuous or connected manner to achieve particular purposes.

8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of texts.

When students use cohesive devices, they apply mode-appropriate language structures to emphasise and develop ideas, and connect parts of texts.

9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.

When students make language choices, they make decisions about the selection of vocabulary that is appropriate to particular purposes and contexts.

10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes.

When students use grammar, they apply knowledge of morphology and syntax to create and express meaning in texts. When students use language structures, they systematically arrange words, phrases, clauses and sentences to express meaning in texts for particular purposes.

11. Use mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

When students use mode-appropriate features, they select written, spoken, visual, gestural or digital features appropriate to the text type to express meaning in texts for particular purposes.

Mode-appropriate features include:

Designing a course of study in Literature

Syllabuses are designed for teachers to make professional decisions to tailor curriculum and assessment design and delivery to suit their school context and the goals, aspirations and abilities of their students within the parameters of Queensland's senior phase of learning.

The syllabus is used by teachers to develop curriculum for their school context. The term course of study describes the unique curriculum and assessment that students engage with in each school context. A course of study is the product of a series of decisions made by a school to select, organise and contextualise subject matter, integrate complementary and important learning, and create assessment tasks in accordance with syllabus specifications.

It is encouraged that, where possible, a course of study is designed such that teaching, learning and assessment activities are integrated and enlivened in an authentic setting.

Course structure

Literature is a General senior syllabus. It contains four QCAA-developed units from which schools develop their course of study.

Each unit has been developed with a notional time of 55 hours of teaching and learning, including assessment.

Students should complete Unit 1 and Unit 2 before beginning Units 3 and 4. Units 3 and 4 are studied as a pair.

More information about the requirements for administering senior syllabuses is available in the 'Queensland curriculum' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Curriculum

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make curriculum decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

These decisions allow teachers to develop a course of study that is rich, engaging and relevant for their students.

Assessment

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make assessment decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

General senior syllabuses contain assessment specifications and conditions for the assessment instruments that must be implemented with Units 3 and 4. These specifications and conditions ensure comparability, equity and validity in assessment.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

In Unit 1 and Unit 2, schools:

In Units 3 and 4, schools develop three assessments using the assessment specifications and conditions provided in the syllabus.

More information about assessment in senior syllabuses is available in 'The assessment system' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Subject matter

Each unit contains a unit description, unit objectives and subject matter. Subject matter is the body of information, mental procedures and psychomotor procedures (see Marzano & Kendall 2007, 2008) that are necessary for students' learning and engagement with the subject. Subject matter itself is not the specification of learning experiences but provides the basis for the design of student learning experiences.

Subject matter has a direct relationship with the unit objectives and provides statements of learning that have been constructed in a similar way to objectives.

Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives

The QCAA is committed to reconciliation. As part of its commitment, the QCAA affirms that:

Guidelines about Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives and resources for teaching are available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/k-12-policies/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-perspectives.

Where appropriate, Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives have been embedded in the subject matter.

Complementary skills

Opportunities for the development of complementary skills have been embedded throughout subject matter. These skills, which overlap and interact with syllabus subject matter, are derived from current education, industry and community expectations and encompass the knowledge, skills, capabilities, behaviours and dispositions that will help students live and work successfully in the 21st century.

These complementary skills are:

It is expected that aspects of literacy, numeracy and 21st century skills will be developed by engaging in the learning outlined in this syllabus. Teachers may choose to create additional explicit and intentional opportunities for the development of these skills as they design the course of study.

Additional subject-specific information

Additional subject-specific information has been included to support and inform the development of a course of study.

Pedagogical and conceptual framework

Education in the discipline of English offers students ways of thinking about, creating and engaging with texts, and how they represent the world and human experience. The framework for the subject's interrelated objectives is informed by an understanding of the relationships between language, text, purpose, context and audience, and how these relationships shape meaning and perspectives. Students engage critically and creatively with a variety of texts, taking into account the ways:

All senior secondary English subjects aim to develop students' critical and creative thinking, both independently and collaboratively, and their capacity to understand and contest complex and challenging ideas in order to form their own interpretations and perspectives, and to understand the interpretations and perspectives of others.

Text selection

Teachers must give students opportunities to engage with a wide range of literary texts to encourage their development as language learners and users, and students are encouraged to read widely across the course. Courses should include literary texts from different times, places and cultures, including texts that aim to develop in all students an awareness of, interest in, and respect for the literary traditions and expressions of other nations in the Asia–Pacific region. Australian texts, including texts by Aboriginal writers and/or Torres Strait Islander writers, must be included across the course of study and within each unit pair of the course. At least one of the Australian texts studied over the four units of the course must be by an Aboriginal writer or Torres Strait Islander writer. Schools may also include texts translated from other languages.

The classification of texts as 'literary' changes over time and across cultural contexts, and texts considered non-literary in some contexts are considered literary in other contexts. For this reason, the term 'literary' as used in this Literature syllabus refers to a way of reading texts rather than a set of qualities in a text that exist independently of how a text is read. The practice of reading a text as a literary text involves a focus on:

Units 1 and 2

For Unit 1, students must study at least:

For Unit 2, students must study at least:

Across the two units, the texts selected for study must include at least:

At least one of the texts selected must be Australian (see the 'Text selection' section).

Other types of texts that students could study include:

Units 3 and 4

In Units 3 and 4 students must study at least six texts from the prescribed text list. The selection must include:

At least one of the texts selected must be Australian.

At least three of the six texts selected across Units 3 and 4 must be studied in depth.

Other types of texts that students could study include:

In Unit 3, at least one text from an international context must be studied. This could include texts translated from other languages. A text studied in Unit 3 or Unit 4 cannot be studied in Unit 1 or Unit 2 of this syllabus, or in any units in the General syllabus of English.

Aesthetic features and stylistic devices

Engaging with aesthetic texts 'allows us to rehearse different ways of seeing the world and different emotional reactions' (Misson & Morgan 2006, p. 136). Such engagement is crucial for developing empathy.

The aesthetic is far more than that which is simply 'beautiful' in a text. It refers to the complex relationship between perception and sensation, and encompasses a wide range of emotional and critical responses to texts.

Aesthetic features and stylistic devices refer to those aspects of texts that prompt emotional and critical reactions. As such, the aesthetic is closely tied to reader/audience positioning. Aesthetic features and stylistic devices may draw upon and interplay with textual features already used for other purposes.

The experience of reading aesthetic texts and the experience of writing them are closely interrelated. The more students engage with the aesthetic dimension of texts, the more they learn to read with their own writing in mind, and write with their reader in mind.

Creators of aesthetic texts, including students as writers, engage in a creative process when crafting texts. This process involves manipulating, refining, and experimenting with language choices and text structures to produce more successful texts.

Style refers to the distinctive ways in which aspects of texts are arranged, the ways particular techniques and forms have been used to create an imaginative reality, and how these arrangements, techniques and forms affect the reading or viewing experience of an audience. Style can distinguish the work of individual writers, the work of a particular period, or works of a particular genre or type of text.

Examples of aesthetic features include:

Stylistic devices can be any literary device or technique, such as:

Analytical essay

The central purpose of an analytical essay in Literature is to inform the reader of an interpretation of a literary text. This analysis is written in a formal tone, includes relevant literary terminology and follows appropriate academic conventions. The audience of an analytical essay is an educated reader familiar with the literary text being discussed. Like any genre, there are many valid ways to respond in an analytical essay.

In the subject Literature, the types of interpretations of literary texts that students are expected to produce change in focus and complexity throughout the course. As they progress through the course, students will develop more informed, complex, exploratory and creative interpretations, supported by a closer and more detailed reading of a literary text, having considered others' interpretations of the text.

An analytical essay is structured around a thesis, which is a statement of the central argument of an essay. This thesis presents an interpretation of a literary text or texts. It is supported by arguments and substantiated by relevant evidence, in the form of discussion, exploration and examination of a literary text.

As the focus of an analytical essay is an interpretation of a literary text, the majority of supporting evidence is comprised of references to this text.

Key terminology

Key terms in this syllabus include:

Reporting

General information about determining and reporting results for senior syllabuses is provided in the 'Determining and reporting results' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Reporting standards

Reporting standards are summary statements that describe typical performance at each of the five levels (A–E).

A

The student, in responding to and creating texts, demonstrates discerning application of knowledge of the relationships between text, context, audience and purpose through analysis and creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in texts; analysis and use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions; and analysis and use of aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve particular effects.

The student demonstrates discerning organisation and development of texts for purpose, audience and context through use of genres and the role of writer/speaker/designer to achieve consistently controlled relationships with audiences in a variety of cultural contexts and social situations; selection, synthesis, organisation and sequencing of subject matter to support perspectives, including use of mode-appropriate cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of texts.

The student demonstrates discerning use of textual features for purpose, audience and context through combination of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures and language choices, including aesthetic and stylistic, to achieve particular purposes; and use of mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

B

The student, in responding to and creating texts, demonstrates effective application of knowledge of the relationships between text, context, audience and purpose through analysis and creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in texts; analysis and use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions; and analysis and use of aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve particular effects.

The student demonstrates effective organisation and development of texts for purpose, audience and context through use of genres and the role of writer/speaker/designer to achieve control over relationships with audiences in a variety of cultural contexts and social situations; selection, synthesis, organisation and sequencing of subject matter to support perspectives, including use of mode-appropriate cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of texts.

The student demonstrates effective use of textual features for purpose, audience and context through combination of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures and language choices, including aesthetic and stylistic, to achieve particular purposes; and use of mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

C

The student, in responding to and creating texts, demonstrates suitable application of knowledge of the relationships between text, context, audience and purpose through analysis and creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in texts; analysis and use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions; and analysis and use of aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve particular effects.

The student demonstrates suitable organisation and development of texts for purpose, audience and context through use of genres and the role of writer/speaker/designer to establish and maintain relationships with audiences in a variety of cultural contexts and social situations; selection, synthesis, organisation and sequencing of subject matter to support perspectives, including use of mode-appropriate cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of texts.

The student demonstrates suitable use of textual features for purpose, audience and context through combination of a range of mostly grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures and language choices, including aesthetic and stylistic, to achieve particular purposes; and use of mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

D

The student, in responding to and creating texts, demonstrates a superficial application of knowledge of the relationships between text, context, audience and purpose through analysis and creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in texts; analysis and some use of ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions; and analysis and some use of aesthetic features and stylistic devices.

The student demonstrates inconsistency in organisation and development of texts for purpose, audience and context through use of genres and the role of writer/speaker/designer to establish relationships with audiences in a variety of cultural contexts and social situations; selection of subject matter and organisation and sequencing of subject matter to support perspectives, including some use of mode-appropriate cohesive devices to connect parts of texts.

The student demonstrates inconsistency in use of textual features for purpose, audience and context through grammar, language structures and language choices, including some aesthetic and stylistic, and use of mode-appropriate features.

E

The student, in responding to and creating texts, demonstrates fragmented application of knowledge of the relationships between text, context, audience and purpose through identification and creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in texts; and identification of the ways attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts.

The student demonstrates fragmented organisation and development of texts for purpose, audience and context through use of genres and the role of writer/speaker/designer; selection and sequencing of subject matter; and some connections between parts of texts.

The student demonstrates fragmented use of textual features through grammar, language structures and language choices, and mode-appropriate features.

Determining and reporting results

Unit 1 and Unit 2

Schools make judgments on individual assessment instruments using a method determined by the school. They may use the reporting standards or develop an instrument-specific marking guide (ISMG). Marks are not required for determining a unit result for reporting to the QCAA.

The unit assessment program comprises the assessment instrument/s designed by the school to allow the students to demonstrate the unit objectives. The unit judgment of A–E is made using reporting standards.

Schools report student results for Unit 1 and Unit 2 to the QCAA as satisfactory (S) or unsatisfactory (U). Where appropriate, schools may also report a not rated (NR).

Units 3 and 4

Schools mark each of the three internal assessment instruments implemented in Units 3 and 4 using ISMGs.

Schools report a provisional mark by criterion to the QCAA for each internal assessment.

Once confirmed by the QCAA, these results will be combined with the result of the external assessment developed and marked by the QCAA.

The QCAA uses these results to determine each student's subject result as a mark out of 100 and as an A–E.

Units

Unit 1: Introduction to literary studies

In Unit 1, students develop knowledge and understanding of the ways literary styles and structures shape how texts are received and responded to by individual readers and audiences. Students study a range of literary forms from various contexts and consider how textual choices engage readers imaginatively, emotionally and critically. They develop familiarity with key terms, concepts and practices that equip them for further studies in literature, and an appreciation of the various ways literary texts are crafted.

Students develop an awareness of how the views and values of readers may influence the interpretation of a text. They develop an understanding of how more studied and critical responses to texts can enhance their own initial personal responses. Students learn to select and discuss aspects of literary texts that support their interpretation.

In analytical responses, students discuss the significant ideas and the distinctive qualities of particular literary texts drawn from a widening range of historical, social, and cultural contexts and substantiate their interpretations with textual analysis.

In the creation of imaginative texts, students use their knowledge and appreciation of literary techniques to explore and experiment with aspects of style and structure to shape representations and perspectives.

Unit objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of imaginative and/or analytical genres to achieve particular purposes in cultural contexts and social situations in relation to literary studies.
  2. Establish and maintain roles of the writer/speaker/designer and relationships with audiences.
  3. Create and/or analyse perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in a range of texts.
  4. Make use of, in their own imaginative texts, the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions, and/or analyse these ways in literary texts created by others.
  5. Use aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve purposes in their own imaginative texts and/or analyse their effects in literary texts.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in imaginative and analytical texts.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve particular purposes in imaginative and analytical texts.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of texts.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes in written, spoken and/or multimodal texts.
  11. Use mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

Subject matter

Ways literary texts are received and responded to

How textual choices affect readers

Creating analytical and imaginative texts

Unit 2: Intertextuality

In Unit 2, students develop knowledge and understanding of the ways literary texts connect with each other. Students study texts that are closely related in terms of genre, concepts and/or context, or texts that are adaptations of other texts. They consider how changes to the form and medium of a text affect its meaning. They compare and contrast the ideas, style and structure of different texts and/or related texts to explore the ways in which texts interact with and build on each other to offer varied representations and perspectives. Students engage with critical readings and imaginative adaptations of literary texts to enhance and develop their own interpretations and responses.

In analytical responses, students establish the connections between the chosen or related texts by analysing their similarities and differences in terms of style, structure and/or subject matter. By experimenting with text structures and stylistic choices, students create texts that reimagine aspects of literary texts to purposefully shape representations and perspectives.

Unit objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of imaginative and/or analytical genres to achieve particular purposes in cultural contexts and social situations.
  2. Establish and maintain roles of the writer/speaker/designer and relationships with audiences.
  3. Create and/or analyse perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in a range of texts.
  4. Make use of, in their own imaginative texts, the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions, and/or analyse these ways in literary texts created by others.
  5. Use aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve purposes in their own imaginative texts and/or analyse their effects in literary texts.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in imaginative and analytical texts.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve particular purposes.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of imaginative and analytical texts.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes in written, spoken and/or multimodal texts.
  11. Use mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

Subject matter

Ways literary texts connect with each other — genre, concepts and contexts

Ways literary texts connect with each other — style and structure

Creating analytical and imaginative texts

Unit 3: Literature and identity

In Unit 3, students develop knowledge and understanding of the relationship between language, culture and identity in literary texts. Students inquire into the power of language to represent ideas, events and people, comparing these across a range of texts, contexts, modes and forms. Through critical analysis, students consider how texts endorse, challenge or question cultural assumptions. In engaging with literary texts, students reflect upon their own backgrounds and experiences and how these affect their interpretations. Students analyse textual representations to explore the cultural assumptions that underpin points of view and perspectives in texts.

In analytical responses, students demonstrate an understanding of how the style and structure of literary texts engage critically with representations of issues and ideas related to culture and identity in particular contexts. Student responses are evidence-based and draw on a range of interpretations of literary texts.

In creative responses, students challenge conventions and reinterpret ideas and perspectives by drawing on their knowledge of literary conventions to create new texts that exploit style and structure.

Unit objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of imaginative and analytical genres to achieve particular purposes in cultural contexts and social situations.
  2. Establish and maintain roles of the writer/speaker/designer and relationships with audiences.
  3. Create perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in their own imaginative texts, and analyse these in literary texts created by others.
  4. Make use of, in their own imaginative texts, the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions, and analyse these ways in literary texts created by others.
  5. Use aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve purposes in their own imaginative texts and analyse their effects in literary texts.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in imaginative and analytical texts.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve imaginative and analytical purposes.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of imaginative and analytical texts.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes.
  11. Use mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

Subject matter

Relationship between language, culture and identity in literary texts

Power of language to represent ideas, events and people

Creating analytical and imaginative texts

Unit 4: Independent explorations

In Unit 4, students demonstrate increasing independence in exploring, interpreting, analysing and appreciating the aesthetic appeal of literary texts and the insights they offer. The unit focuses on the dynamic nature of literary explorations and interpretations, and how a close examination of structure, style and subject matter of literary texts supports various responses.

In analytical responses, students draw on a range of interpretations of a literary text to develop their own independent, informed and sustained exploration and interpretation that is supported by close textual analysis.

In creating texts, students independently develop and compose original, imaginative texts in which they purposefully manipulate aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve particular effects.

Unit objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of imaginative and analytical genres to achieve particular purposes in cultural contexts and social situations.
  2. Establish and maintain roles of the writer/speaker/designer and relationships with audiences.
  3. Create perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and places in their own imaginative texts, and analyse these in literary texts created by others.
  4. Make use of, in their own imaginative texts, the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions, and analyse these ways in literary texts created by others.
  5. Use aesthetic features and stylistic devices to achieve purposes in their own imaginative texts and analyse their effects in literary texts.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in imaginative and analytical texts.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve imaginative and analytical purposes.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of imaginative and analytical texts.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes.
  11. Use mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

Subject matter

Dynamic nature of literary interpretation

Close examination of style, structure and subject matter

Creating analytical and imaginative texts

Assessment

Internal assessment 1: Examination — extended response (25%)

Students write an analytical essay in response to a seen question/task on a literary text from the prescribed text list.

Assessment objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of an analytical essay to inform readers of an interpretation of a literary text.
  2. Establish and maintain the role of essay writer and relationships with readers.
  3. Analyse perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text, and others' interpretations of, and/or responses to, this text.
  4. Analyse the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin a literary text and invite audiences to take up positions.
  5. Analyse the effects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in a literary text in prompting critical and emotional responses.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in an essay.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to inform readers of an interpretation of a literary text.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of an essay.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts in an essay.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes in an essay.
  11. Use written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes in an essay.

Specifications

The teacher provides an examination that asks students to:

Conditions

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Knowledge application 3, 4, 5 9
Organisation and development 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 9
Textual features 9, 10, 11 7
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA1)

Knowledge application

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning analysis of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text, and of others' interpretations of, and/or responses to, this text
• discerning analysis of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin a literary text and invite audiences to take up positions
• discerning analysis of the effects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in a literary text in prompting critical and emotional responses
8–9
• effective analysis of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text, and of others' interpretations of, and/or responses to, this text
• effective analysis of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin a literary text and invite audiences to take up positions
• effective analysis of the effects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in a literary text in prompting critical and emotional responses
6–7
• adequate analysis of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text, and of others' interpretations of, and/or responses, to this text
• adequate analysis of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin a literary text and invite audiences to take up positions
• adequate analysis of the effects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in a literary text in prompting critical and emotional responses
5
• superficial analysis of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text, and of others' interpretations of, and/or responses, to this text
• superficial analysis of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin a literary text
• identification of some aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices and some of their effects in a literary text
3–4
• identification of some perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text
• identification of some cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs in a literary text
• identification of some aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Organisation and development

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning use of patterns and conventions of an analytical essay, and the role of essay writer, to analyse the literary text
• discerning selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives
• discerning organisation and sequencing of subject matter, including the discerning use of cohesive devices, to emphasise ideas and connect parts of the analytical text
8–9
• effective use of patterns and conventions of an analytical essay, and the role of essay writer, to analyse the literary text
• effective selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives
• effective organisation and sequencing of subject matter, including the effective use of cohesive devices, to emphasise ideas and connect parts of the analytical text
6–7
• suitable use of patterns and conventions of an analytical essay, and the role of essay writer, to analyse the literary text
• suitable selection and adequate synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives
• suitable organisation and sequencing of subject matter, including the suitable use of cohesive devices, to emphasise ideas and connect parts of the analytical text
5
• inconsistent use of patterns and conventions of an analytical essay, and the role of essay writer, to write a response
• narrow selection of subject matter to support ideas
• disjointed organisation and sequencing of subject matter, and some use of cohesive devices, to connect parts of the text
3–4
• fragmented use of patterns and conventions of an analytical essay, and aspects of the role of writer
• fragmented selection of subject matter
• some connections between parts of the text.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Textual features

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning language choices for particular purposes
• discerning combination of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures, including clauses and sentences, to achieve particular purposes
• discerning use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes
6–7
• effective language choices for particular purposes
• effective use of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures, including clauses and sentences, to achieve particular purposes
• effective use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes
4–5
• suitable language choices for particular purposes
• suitable use of a range of mostly grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures, including clauses and sentences, to achieve particular purposes
• suitable use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve purposes
3
• inconsistent language choices
• inconsistent use of grammar and language structures
• use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, that vary in suitability
2
• inappropriate language choices
• fragmented use of grammar and language structures
• fragmented use of written features, including spelling and punctuation.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 2: Imaginative response (25%)

Students focus on the reinterpretation of ideas and perspectives in a literary text from the current prescribed text list (the base text). They draw on their knowledge of the relationship between language, culture and identity to create a reimagined spoken/multimodal response for a new cultural context.

Assessment objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of an imaginative genre to engage audiences with a reimagined text and invite them to reinterpret the base text.
  2. Establish and maintain the role of the speaker/designer and relationships with audiences.
  3. Create perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a reimagined text.
  4. Make use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts to invite audiences to reinterpret the base text.
  5. Use aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in a reimagined text to prompt emotional and critical responses.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in the reimagined text.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve particular purposes.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of the reimagined text.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes.
  11. Use mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes.

Specifications

This task requires students to:

Conditions

Response requirements

One of the following:

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Knowledge application 3, 4, 5 9
Organisation and development 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 9
Textual features 9, 10, 11 7
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA2)

Knowledge application

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• subtle and complex creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• discerning manipulation of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts, to invite audiences to reinterpret the base text
• discerning use of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices to prompt emotional and critical audience responses
8–9
• effective creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• effective manipulation of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts, to invite audiences to reinterpret the base text
• effective use of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices to prompt emotional and critical audience responses
6–7
• appropriate creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• appropriate use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts, to invite audiences to reinterpret the base text
• appropriate use of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices to prompt audience responses
5
• superficial creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• superficial use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts, to invite audiences to reinterpret the base text
• use of aspects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices that vary in suitability
3–4
• creation of fragmented perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• fragmented use of some ways ideas underpin texts
• fragmented use of language features.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Organisation and development

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning use of the patterns and conventions of the chosen imaginative genre, and the role of the speaker/designer, to engage audiences with a reimagined text and invite them to reinterpret the base text
• discerning selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• discerning organisation and sequencing of subject matter to achieve particular purposes, including the discerning use of cohesive devices to develop and emphasise ideas and connect parts of the reimagined spoken/multimodal text
8–9
• effective use of the patterns and conventions of the chosen imaginative genre, and the role of the speaker/designer, to engage audiences with a reimagined text and invite them to reinterpret the base text
• effective selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• effective organisation and sequencing of subject matter to achieve particular purposes, including the effective use of cohesive devices to develop and emphasise ideas and connect parts of the reimagined spoken/multimodal text
6–7
• suitable use of the patterns and conventions of the chosen imaginative genre, and the role of the speaker/designer, to establish and maintain relationships with audiences
• suitable selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives in a reimagined spoken/multimodal text
• suitable organisation and sequencing of subject matter to achieve particular purposes, including the suitable use of cohesive devices to develop and emphasise ideas and connect parts of the reimagined spoken/multimodal text
5
• inconsistent use of the patterns and conventions of the chosen imaginative genre, and the role of the speaker/designer, to establish relationships with audiences
• narrow selection of subject matter to support perspectives
• disjointed organisation and sequencing of subject matter, including some use of cohesive devices to connect parts of the reimagined spoken/multimodal text
3–4
• fragmented use of the patterns and conventions of the chosen imaginative genre and aspects of the role of the speaker/designer
• fragmented selection of subject matter
• some connections between parts of the text.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Textual features

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning language choices for particular purposes in a specific context
• discerning combination of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures to achieve particular purposes
• discerning use of mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes
6–7
• effective language choices for particular purposes in a specific context
• effective use of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures to achieve particular purposes
• effective use of mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes
4–5
• suitable language choices for particular purposes in a specific context
• suitable use of a range of mostly grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures to achieve particular purposes
• suitable use of mode-appropriate features to achieve particular purposes
3
• language choices that vary in suitability
• uneven use of grammar and language structures
• use of mode-appropriate features that vary in suitability
2
• inappropriate language choices
• fragmented use of grammar and language structures
• fragmented use of mode-appropriate features.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 3: Imaginative response (25%)

Students focus on the creation and crafting of an original literary text. They independently develop and create an original, imaginative written text in which they purposefully manipulate aesthetic features and stylistic devices to shape representations and perspectives and achieve particular effects. There is no prescribed text list for this assessment instrument.

Assessment objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of an imaginative genre to achieve particular purposes in a specific context.
  2. Establish and maintain the role of the writer and relationships with audiences.
  3. Create perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in an imaginative text.
  4. Make use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions.
  5. Use aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in an imaginative text to prompt emotional and critical audience responses.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in an imaginative text.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve particular purposes.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of an imaginative text.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes and contexts.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes.
  11. Use written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes.

Specifications

This task requires students to:

Conditions

Response requirements

Written: up to 2000 words

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Knowledge application 3, 4, 5 9
Organisation and development 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 9
Textual features 9, 10, 11 7
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA3)

Knowledge application

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• subtle and complex creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in an imaginative text
• discerning manipulation of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions
• discerning use of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices to prompt emotional and critical audience responses
8–9
• effective creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in an imaginative text
• effective manipulation of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions
• effective use of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices to prompt emotional and critical audience responses
6–7
• appropriate creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in an imaginative text
• appropriate use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions
• appropriate use of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices to prompt emotional and critical audience responses
5
• superficial creation of perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in an imaginative text
• superficial use of the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin texts and invite audiences to take up positions
• use of aspects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices that vary in suitability
3–4
• creation of fragmented perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in an imaginative text
• fragmented use of some ways ideas underpin texts
• fragmented use of language features.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Organisation and development

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning use of the patterns and conventions of an imaginative text and the role of the writer to achieve particular purposes and relationships with audiences
• discerning selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives
• discerning organisation and sequencing of subject matter to achieve particular purposes, including discerning use of cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of an imaginative text
8–9
• effective use of the patterns and conventions of an imaginative text and the role of the writer to achieve particular purposes and relationships with audiences
• effective selection and synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives
• effective organisation and sequencing of subject matter to achieve particular purposes, including effective use of cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of an imaginative text
6–7
• suitable use of the patterns and conventions of an imaginative text and the role of the writer to achieve particular purposes and relationships with audiences
• suitable selection and adequate synthesis of subject matter to support perspectives
• suitable organisation and sequencing of subject matter to achieve particular purposes, including suitable use of cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of an imaginative text
5
• inconsistent use of the patterns and conventions of an imaginative text and of the role of the writer
• narrow selection of subject matter to support perspectives
• disjointed organisation and sequencing of subject matter, including some use of cohesive devices to connect parts of an imaginative text
3–4
• fragmented use of the patterns and conventions of an imaginative text and of aspects of the role of the writer
• fragmented selection of subject matter
• some connections between parts of a text.
1–2
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Textual features

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• discerning language choices for particular purposes
• discerning combination of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures to achieve particular purposes, including clauses and sentences
• discerning use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes
6–7
• effective language choices for particular purposes
• effective use of a range of grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures to achieve particular purposes, including clauses and sentences
• effective use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes
4–5
• suitable language choices for particular purposes
• suitable use of a range of mostly grammatically accurate/appropriate language structures to achieve particular purposes, including clauses and sentences
• suitable use of written features, including conventional spelling and punctuation, to achieve particular purposes
3
• inconsistent language choices
• inconsistent use of grammar and language structures
• use of written features, including spelling and punctuation, that vary in suitability
2
• inappropriate language choices
• fragmented use of grammar and language structures
• fragmented use of written features, including spelling and punctuation.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

External assessment: Examination — extended response (25%)

External assessment is developed and marked by the QCAA. The external assessment in Literature is common to all schools and administered under the same conditions, at the same time, on the same day.

Assessment objectives

  1. Use patterns and conventions of an analytical essay to respond to an unseen question/task.
  2. Establish and maintain the role of essay writer and relationships with readers.
  3. Analyse perspectives and representations of concepts, identities, times and/or places in a literary text.
  4. Analyse the ways cultural assumptions, attitudes, values and/or beliefs underpin a literary text and invite audiences to take up positions.
  5. Analyse the effects of aesthetic features and/or stylistic devices in a literary text.
  6. Select and synthesise subject matter to support perspectives in an essay response to an unseen question/task.
  7. Organise and sequence subject matter to achieve particular purposes.
  8. Use cohesive devices to emphasise ideas and connect parts of an essay.
  9. Make language choices for particular purposes in an essay.
  10. Use grammar and language structures for particular purposes in an essay.
  11. Use written features to achieve particular purposes in an essay.

Specifications

This examination:

Conditions

Glossary

The syllabus glossary is available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/common/snr_glossary_cognitive_verbs.pdf.

References

Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2008, Designing and Assessing Educational Objectives: Applying the new taxonomy, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California. ——2007, The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2nd edn, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California. Misson, R & Morgan, W 2006, Critical Literacy and the Aesthetic: Transforming the English classroom, National Council of Teachers of English, Illinois.

Version history

Version Date of change Information
1.0 January 2024 Released for familiarisation and planning (with implementation starting in 2025)
1.1 July 2024 Released for implementation with minor updates
1.2 October 2024 ISBN removed and minor updates
1.3 January 2026 File metadata changes to support new Syllabuses application functionality