Original source · Published March 2026 · Updated March 2026

Course overview

Rationale

Technologies have been an integral part of society for as long as humans have had the desire to create solutions to improve their own and others' quality of life. Technologies have an impact on people and societies by transforming, restoring and sustaining the world in which we live. Australia needs enterprising and innovative individuals with the ability to make discerning decisions concerning the development, use and impact of technologies. When developing technologies, these individuals need to be able to work independently and collaboratively to solve complex, open-ended problems. Subjects in the Technologies learning area prepare students to be effective problem-solvers as they learn about and work with contemporary and emerging technologies.

Students who study Aerospace Systems learn about the fundamentals, history and future of the aerospace industry. They gain knowledge of aeronautics, aerospace operations, safety management systems (including human factors), and systems thinking, enabling them to solve real-world-related aerospace problems using the problem-solving process in Aerospace Systems. In this subject, students use systems thinking habits, systems thinking strategies, and aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles to explore problems and develop solutions. Students learn to understand and interpret the relationships between and within connected systems and their component parts. They identify patterns in problematic aerospace systems situations and make proposals concerning solutions. This learnt ability provides students with the higher order cognitive capacity to engage with problems that exist in an exciting and dynamic technological world. Students develop and use skills that include analysis, decision-making, justification, recognition, comprehension and evaluation to develop solutions to aerospace problem situations. The problem-based learning framework in Aerospace systems encourages students to become self-directed learners and develop beneficial collaboration and management skills.

Students learn transferrable 21st century skills that support their life aspirations, including critical thinking, creative thinking, communication, collaboration and teamwork, personal and social skills, and information & communication technologies (ICT) skills. Students become adaptable and resilient through their problem-solving learning experiences, improving their ability to interpret events, analyse situations and comprehend cause-and-effect relationships. Through their study of Aerospace Systems, students appreciate that short-term fixes may have long-term implications. Students recognise the complexity of global, national and local community problem situations and understand the challenges faced in generating sustainable and durable solutions.

Syllabus objectives

The syllabus objectives outline what students have the opportunity to learn.

1. Recognise and describe aerospace systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles.

When students recognise aerospace systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles they identify or recall related aerospace technology knowledge, including mathematic calculations and scientific concepts and principles to acknowledge the characteristics of problems, the areas of possible weakness and the relationships between systems, subsystems and system components. Students describe by giving an account of the characteristics or features of problems, knowledge, concepts and principles.

2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships.

When students symbolise, they represent idea and solution development, and relationships using visual frameworks, causal loop diagrams, flow charts, diagrams, sketches and pictures. When students explain, they use knowledge, understanding and reasoning to make ideas, solutions and the relationships between aerospace systems and system components plain or clear by describing them in more detail or revealing relevant facts.

3. Analyse problems and information.

When students analyse problems and information, they research and investigate to explain and interpret, for the purpose of finding meaning or relationships. They determine the reasonableness of information and ascertain patterns, similarities and differences in order to identify elements, components and features, and their relationship to the structure of problems.

4. Determine success criteria for aerospace problems.

When students determine success criteria for aerospace problems, they establish, conclude or ascertain solution requirements after consideration of elements, components and features, and their relationship to the structure of problems.

5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible solutions.

When students synthesise information and ideas to propose possible solutions, they combine and integrate information and ideas and resolve uncertainties using knowledge gained through investigation, collaboration and testing to create new understanding.

6. Generate solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of proposals.

When students generate solutions, they produce or simulate a solution that, when tested, provides data to determine the proposal's capability to be reasonably achieved.

7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.

When students evaluate, they appraise ideas and solutions by weighing up or assessing strengths, implications and limitations against success criteria. When students refine ideas and solutions, they modify to make improvements relative to success criteria. They use data, provided by testing, to evaluate and refine ideas and solutions. When students make justified recommendations, they put forward a point of view or suggestion with supporting evidence to make modifications or enhancements.

8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions for particular purposes and contexts.

When students make decisions about mode-appropriate features and conventions, they use written, visual, and spoken features to express meaning for particular purposes in a range of contexts. Written communication includes language conventions, specific vocabulary and language features such as annotations, paragraphs and sentences. Visual communication includes photographs, sketches, drawings, diagrams and motion graphics. Spoken communication includes verbal and nonverbal features and may be for live or virtual audiences. Students use referencing conventions to practise ethical scholarship for particular purposes.

Designing a course of study in Aerospace Systems

Syllabuses are designed for teachers to make professional decisions to tailor curriculum and assessment design and delivery to suit their school context and the goals, aspirations and abilities of their students within the parameters of Queensland's senior phase of learning.

The syllabus is used by teachers to develop curriculum for their school context. The term course of study describes the unique curriculum and assessment that students engage with in each school context. A course of study is the product of a series of decisions made by a school to select, organise and contextualise subject matter, integrate complementary and important learning, and create assessment tasks in accordance with syllabus specifications.

It is encouraged that, where possible, a course of study is designed such that teaching, learning and assessment activities are integrated and enlivened in an authentic setting.

Course structure

Aerospace Systems is a General senior syllabus. It contains four QCAA-developed units from which schools develop their course of study.

Each unit has been developed with a notional time of 55 hours of teaching and learning, including assessment.

Students should complete Unit 1 and Unit 2 before beginning Units 3 and 4. Units 3 and 4 are studied as a pair.

More information about the requirements for administering senior syllabuses is available in the 'Queensland curriculum' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Curriculum

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make curriculum decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

These decisions allow teachers to develop a course of study that is rich, engaging and relevant for their students.

Assessment

Senior syllabuses set out only what is essential while being flexible so teachers can make assessment decisions to suit their students, school context, resources and expertise.

General senior syllabuses contain assessment specifications and conditions for the assessment instruments that must be implemented with Units 3 and 4. These specifications and conditions ensure comparability, equity and validity in assessment.

Within the requirements set out in this syllabus and the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook, schools have autonomy to decide:

In Unit 1 and Unit 2, schools:

In Units 3 and 4, schools develop three assessments using the assessment specifications and conditions provided in the syllabus.

More information about assessment in senior syllabuses is available in 'The assessment system' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Subject matter

Each unit contains a unit description, unit objectives and subject matter. Subject matter is the body of information, mental procedures and psychomotor procedures (see Marzano & Kendall 2007, 2008) that are necessary for students' learning and engagement with the subject. Subject matter itself is not the specification of learning experiences but provides the basis for the design of student learning experiences.

Subject matter has a direct relationship with the unit objectives and provides statements of learning that have been constructed in a similar way to objectives.

Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives

The QCAA is committed to reconciliation. As part of its commitment, the QCAA affirms that:

Guidelines about Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives and resources for teaching are available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/k-12-policies/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-perspectives.

Where appropriate, Aboriginal perspectives and Torres Strait Islander perspectives have been embedded in the subject matter.

Complementary skills

Opportunities for the development of complementary skills have been embedded throughout subject matter. These skills, which overlap and interact with syllabus subject matter, are derived from current education, industry and community expectations and encompass the knowledge, skills, capabilities, behaviours and dispositions that will help students live and work successfully in the 21st century.

These complementary skills are:

It is expected that aspects of literacy, numeracy and 21st century skills will be developed by engaging in the learning outlined in this syllabus. Teachers may choose to create additional explicit and intentional opportunities for the development of these skills as they design the course of study.

Additional subject-specific information

Additional subject-specific information has been included to support and inform the development of a course of study.

Procedural knowledge

This procedural knowledge must be integrated into the subject matter and assessment of all units. Each of four units are structured to provide students with the opportunity to apply the Aerospace systems problem-solving process (see Figure 1). Each unit includes a particular context/s with associated knowledge and skills.

Figure 1: The problem-solving process in Aerospace Systems

The problem-solving process in Aerospace Systems is iterative and includes the four phases of Explore, Develop, Generate and Evaluate and refine. Evaluate and refine is a critical phase as it involves making decisions about where and how the process will proceed relative to the other phases. The decisions students make about moving within and between the various phases reflect the iterative nature of the process.

Explore phase

The explore phase involves students examining problem-related systems, subsystems and system components to recognise structure and comprehend relationships.

To explore the problem, students:

Develop phase

The develop phase involves students creating new understanding to propose possible solutions. Students evaluate ideas and aerospace systems solutions against success criteria and data.

To develop ideas, students:

Generate phase

The generate phase involves students producing or simulating a solution that, when implemented, provides data to determine its capability to be reasonably achieved.

To generate solutions, students:

Evaluate and refine phase

The evaluate and refine phase involves students appraising ideas and solutions against success criteria and data to make modifications and improvements. Evaluation occurs throughout each phase of the problem-solving process to refine ideas and possible solutions in response to success criteria and data.

To evaluate and refine, students:

Reporting

General information about determining and reporting results for senior syllabuses is provided in the 'Determining and reporting results' section of the QCE and QCIA policy and procedures handbook.

Reporting standards

Reporting standards are summary statements that describe typical performance at each of the five levels (A–E).

A

The student, for a range of aerospace situations, demonstrates accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of aerospace systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships.

The student demonstrates insightful analysis of problems and relevant information, and astute determination of essential success criteria.

The student demonstrates coherent and logical synthesis of relevant information and ideas to propose possible solutions; critical evaluation and discerning refinement of ideas and solutions using success criteria to make astute recommendations justified by evidence; proficient generation of solutions to provide valid data to critically determine the feasibility of proposals; discerning decision-making about, and proficient use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions for purpose.

B

The student, for a range of aerospace situations, demonstrates accurate recognition and effective description of aerospace systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships.

The student demonstrates considered analysis of problems and relevant information, and reasoned determination of effective success criteria.

The student demonstrates logical synthesis of relevant information and ideas to propose possible solutions; reasoned evaluation and effective refinement of ideas and solutions using success criteria to make considered recommendations justified by evidence; effective generation of solutions to provide valid data to effectively determine the feasibility of proposals; effective decision-making about, and fluent use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions for purpose.

C

The student, in a range of aerospace contexts, demonstrates appropriate recognition and description of aerospace systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; competent symbolisation of and adequate explanation of some ideas, solutions and relationships.

The student demonstrates appropriate analysis of problems and information, and logical determination of appropriate success criteria.

The student demonstrates simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions; feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions using some success criteria to make fundamental recommendations justified by evidence; adequate generation of solutions to provide relevant data to determine the feasibility of proposals; appropriate decision-making about, and use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions for purpose.

D

The student, for a range of aerospace situations, demonstrates variable recognition and superficial description of aspects of problems, concepts or principles; variable symbolisation or superficial explanation of aspects of ideas, solutions or relationships.

The student demonstrates superficial analysis of problems and partial information, and reasonable determination of some success criteria.

The student demonstrates rudimentary synthesis of partial information or ideas to propose solutions; superficial evaluation of ideas or solutions using some success criteria to make elementary recommendations; partial generation of solutions to provide elements of data to partially determine the feasibility of proposals; inconsistent decision-making about, and inconsistent use of, mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate.

E

The student, for a range of aerospace situations, demonstrates recognition of aspects of problems, concepts or principles and disjointed symbolisation or explanation of aspects of ideas or solutions.

The student demonstrates the making of statements about problems, concepts or principles.

The student demonstrates unclear combinations of information or ideas; identification of a change to an idea or a solution; generation of elements of solutions; unclear or fragmented use of mode-appropriate features, language and conventions.

Determining and reporting results

Unit 1 and Unit 2

Schools make judgments on individual assessment instruments using a method determined by the school. They may use the reporting standards or develop an instrument-specific marking guide (ISMG). Marks are not required for determining a unit result for reporting to the QCAA.

The unit assessment program comprises the assessment instrument/s designed by the school to allow the students to demonstrate the unit objectives. The unit judgment of A–E is made using reporting standards.

Schools report student results for Unit 1 and Unit 2 to the QCAA as satisfactory (S) or unsatisfactory (U). Where appropriate, schools may also report a not rated (NR).

Units 3 and 4

Schools mark each of the three internal assessment instruments implemented in Units 3 and 4 using ISMGs.

Schools report a provisional mark by criterion to the QCAA for each internal assessment.

Once confirmed by the QCAA, these results will be combined with the result of the external assessment developed and marked by the QCAA.

The QCAA uses these results to determine each student's subject result as a mark out of 100 and as an A–E.

Units

Unit 1: Introduction to aerospace systems

In Unit 1, students are introduced to the technology, concepts and principles associated with the aerospace industry. They learn about the global, national and local importance of the industry. Students investigate the industry's historical development and consider the challenges associated with meeting the transportation needs and expectations of future societies. Students explore problems associated with the increasing global demand for safe and efficient aircraft, pilots, support staff, maintenance staff and ground and airspace support systems. In this unit, students gain a basic understanding of aerodynamics and aircraft flight systems, concepts and principles such as lift, weight and drag, instability, high- and low-speed flight control, piston and gas turbine engines, electrical supply, control force and fuel delivery. Students gain an understanding of the potential impacts of weather conditions on various aerospace operations and the systems used to mitigate disruption.

Students learn about and use systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies, such as visual frameworks, causal loops and feedback loops to recognise and classify the interrelationships that exist within and between various aerospace systems.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe problems, aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies in relation to aerospace systems and structures.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships in relation to aerospace systems and structures.
  3. Analyse problems and information in relation to aerospace systems and structures.
  4. Determine success criteria for aerospace systems and structures problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible aerospace systems and structures solutions.
  6. Generate aerospace systems and structures solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of proposals.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Solving aerospace problems

Topic 2: Aerospace industries

Topic 3: Aerodynamics

Topic 4: Aircraft systems

Topic 5: Aerospace weather systems

Unit 2: Aerospace technologies

Unit 2 includes learning experiences beyond traditional aircraft to build on students' technology knowledge of contemporary aerospace. These emerging technologies include satellites, space vehicles and remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) and are finding innovative 21st century applications, for example, ways in which aerospace-related technologies can be used to solve problems for people and communities in need. Students develop their knowledge and understanding of the applications of these future-focused and sometimes non-traditional aerospace technologies (or assets) and operations (asset deployment) to solve problems through use of systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies. In this unit, students engage with real-world problems to develop innovative future-focused solutions.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe problems, aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies in relation to assets and asset-related operational systems.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships in relation to assets and asset-related operational systems.
  3. Analyse problems and information in relation to assets and asset-related operational systems.
  4. Determine success criteria for assets and asset-related operational system problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible assets and asset-related operational systems solutions.
  6. Generate assets and asset-related operational systems solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of proposals.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Operational assets

Topic 2: Operational environments

Topic 3: Operational control systems

Topic 4: Future applications

Unit 3: Aerospace ecosystems

In Unit 3, students will study the ecosystems used in the commercially competitive air transportation industry. The unit topics provide a focus for student learning, and problem-solving engages students in the development of practical solutions to actual, possible or probable operational problems. Students use systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies, including visual frameworks and causal loop diagrams to explore and document the relationships between and within aerospace ecosystems. Real-world situations, case studies and simulations are used to support student learning.

Learning in this unit equips students with an appreciation for the role that aerospace ecosystems and their interconnectivity play in promoting public confidence in a highly competitive and safety-conscious industry.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe problems, aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies in relation to operational systems.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships in relation to operational systems.
  3. Analyse problems and information in relation to operational systems.
  4. Determine success criteria for operational systems problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible operational systems solutions.
  6. Generate operational systems solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of proposals.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Aerospace regulatory systems

Topic 2: Human performance

Topic 3: Safety management systems and human factors

Topic 4: Operational accident and incident investigation processes

Topic 5: Airport and airline operation systems

Unit 4: Aircraft performance systems and human factors

In Unit 4, students study aircraft performance systems and human factors to understand the issues that impact on their operation in aerospace contexts. Unit topics provide an instructional focus for problem-solving experiences that promote students' understanding of the necessity for continual development of aircraft systems technologies. Students use systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies to explore aircraft operational systems in order to solve actual, possible or probable problems. Through their study of this unit, students develop an understanding of the interdependencies that exist between and within the various systems that function to maintain the safe and efficient operation of innovative contemporary aircraft.

Learning in this unit equips students with an appreciation for the role that applied aerospace technologies play in the promotion of public confidence in a highly competitive and safety-conscious industry.

Unit objectives

  1. Recognise and describe problems, aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies in relation to aircraft performance systems and human factors.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and human factors.
  3. Analyse problems and information in relation to aircraft performance systems and human factors.
  4. Determine success criteria for aircraft performance systems and human factors problems.
  5. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible aircraft performance systems and human factors solutions.
  6. Generate aircraft performance systems and human factors solutions to provide data to determine the feasibility of proposals.
  7. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.
  8. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of solutions.

Subject matter

Topic 1: Airspace management

Topic 2: Aircraft performance

Topic 3: Aircraft maintenance

Topic 4: Aircraft navigation and radio communication technologies

Topic 5: Human performance and limitations

Assessment

Internal assessment 1: Aerospace solution (25%)

Students document the application of a problem-solving process in response to an identified real-world aerospace problem. The response is a coherent work that includes written paragraphs and annotations, diagrams, sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, spreadsheets and prototypes.

Assessment objectives

  1. Symbolise and explain ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations.
  2. Determine success criteria for the operational systems problem.
  3. Synthesise information and ideas to propose a possible aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations solution.
  4. Generate an aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations solution to provide data to determine the feasibility of the proposal.
  5. Evaluate and refine ideas and a solution to make justified recommendations.
  6. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of the solution.

Specifications

This task requires students to:

It is recommended that this task is designed so that students can develop a response in approximately 10 hours of class time.

Stimulus specifications

The teacher provides an appropriate aerospace operational systems problem, for example:

Conditions

Response requirements

Written and visual (including images, graphs, calculations and diagrams): up to 10 A4 pages, up to 2000 words

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Symbolising and Communicating 2, 8 7
Determining and Generating 4, 6 9
Synthesising and Evaluating 5, 7 9
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA1)

Symbolising and Communicating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations with visual frameworks and flow charts, causal and feedback loops, diagrams and sketches and/or pictures
• discerning decision-making about, and proficient use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
6–7
• effective symbolisation and considered explanation of ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations with visual frameworks and/or flow charts, causal and/or feedback loops, diagrams and/or sketches and/or pictures
• effective decision-making about, and fluent use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
4–5
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of some ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations with visual frameworks and/or flow charts, causal and/or feedback loops, diagrams and/or sketches and/or pictures
• appropriate decision-making about, and use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, suitable language, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
2–3
• inconsistent symbolisation or superficial explanation of aspects of ideas, a solution, or relationships in relation to aerospace regulatory systems, safety, and airline and/or airport operations
• inconsistent decision-making about, and inconsistent use of written and visual features, suitable language, grammar and language structures, referencing conventions.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Determining and Generating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• astute determination of essential success criteria for the operational systems problem
• proficient generation of a solution, including aerospace regulatory systems, safety, airline and/or airport operations
• provide valid data to critically determine the feasibility of a solution
8–9
• reasoned determination of effective success criteria for the operational systems problem
• effective generation of a solution, including aerospace regulatory systems, safety, airline and/or airport operations
• provide valid data to effectively determine the feasibility of a proposal
6–7
• logical determination of appropriate success criteria for the operational systems problem
• adequate generation of a solution, including aerospace regulatory systems, safety, airline and/or airport operations
• provide relevant data to determine the feasibility of a proposal
4–5
• reasonable determination of some success criteria for the operational systems problem
• partial generation of a solution, including aerospace regulatory systems, safety, airline and/or airport operations
• provide elements of data to partially determine the feasibility of a proposal
2–3
• statements about some success criteria for the operational systems problem
• generation of elements of a solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Synthesising and Evaluating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• coherent and logical synthesis of relevant aerospace systems, technology and research information, and ideas to propose a possible solution, including aerospace regulatory systems, safety, airline and/or airport operations solution
• critical evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• discerning refinement of a solution to make astute recommendations justified by data and research evidence
8–9
• logical synthesis of relevant aerospace systems, technology and research information, and ideas to propose a possible solution, including aerospace regulatory systems and/or safety, airline and/or airport operations solution
• reasoned evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• effective refinement of a solution to make considered recommendations justified by data and research evidence
6–7
• simple synthesis of aerospace systems, technology, and research information and ideas to propose a possible solution, including aerospace regulatory systems and/or safety, airline and/or airport operations solution
• feasible evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• adequate refinement of ideas and a solution to make fundamental recommendations justified by data and research evidence
4–5
• rudimentary synthesis of partial aerospace systems, technology, or research information and/or ideas to propose a possible solution, including aerospace regulatory systems or safety or airline and/or airport operations solution
• superficial evaluation of ideas or a solution using some success criteria to make elementary recommendations
2–3
• unclear combinations of information or ideas
• identification of a change about an idea or the solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 2: Examination — combination response (25%)

Assessment objectives

  1. Recognise and describe problems, aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies in relation to aerospace operational systems.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships in relation to aerospace operational systems.
  3. Analyse problems and information in relation to aerospace operational systems.
  4. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible aerospace operational systems solutions.
  5. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.

Specifications

The teacher provides an examination that includes:

Question specifications

The examination must be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Focus of question Mark allocation (± 2%) Objectives In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 1, 3 and 5, and can provide evidence of Objective 2. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements
• the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, and in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements and connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to aerospace operational systems
• the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, and in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 3, 5 and 7. choose and apply appropriate procedures in a situation where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements and connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to aerospace operational systems
• the required procedure is not clear from the way the question is posed, and in a context in which students have had limited prior experience

Stimulus specifications

Conditions

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Aerospace systems knowledge and problem-solving 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 25
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA2)

Aerospace systems knowledge and problem-solving Cut-off Marks
Across the full range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• critical evaluation and discerning refinement of ideas and solutions to make astutely justified recommendations
>96% 25
Across the full range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• critical evaluation and discerning refinement of ideas and solutions to make astutely justified recommendations
>93% 24
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• critical evaluation and discerning refinement of ideas and solutions to make astutely justified recommendations
>89% 23
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar, complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate and discriminating recognition and discerning description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships
• insightful and accurate analysis of problems and information
• coherent and logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• critical evaluation and discerning refinement of ideas and solutions to make astutely justified recommendations
>86% 22
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• reasoned evaluation and effective refinement of ideas and solutions to make considered recommendations
>82% 21
In a comprehensive range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas, solutions and relationships
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• reasoned evaluation and effective refinement of ideas and solutions to make considered recommendations
>78% 20
In a range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas and solutions
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• reasoned evaluation and effective refinement of ideas and solutions to make considered recommendations
>75% 19
In a range of simple familiar situations, and in complex familiar and complex unfamiliar situations:
• accurate recognition and effective description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• methodical symbolisation and effective explanation of ideas and solutions
• considered analysis of problems and information
• logical synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• reasoned evaluation and effective refinement of ideas and solutions to make considered recommendations
>71% 18
In a range of simple familiar situations and in complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make fundamental recommendations
>68% 17
In a range of simple familiar situations and in complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make fundamental recommendations
>64% 16
In a range of simple familiar situations and in some complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make fundamental recommendations
>60% 15
In a range of simple familiar situations and in some complex familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make fundamental recommendations
>57% 14
In simple familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• variable symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make fundamental recommendations
>53% 13
In simple familiar situations:
• appropriate recognition and description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• variable symbolisation and appropriate explanation of ideas and solutions
• appropriate analysis of problems and information
• simple synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• feasible evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make fundamental recommendations
>50% 12
In simple familiar situations:
• variable recognition and superficial description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• variable symbolisation and superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• superficial evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make elementary recommendations
>46% 11
In simple familiar situations:
• variable recognition and superficial description of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• variable symbolisation and superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose possible solutions
• superficial evaluation and adequate refinement of ideas and solutions to make elementary recommendations
>42% 10
In some simple familiar situations:
• variable recognition and superficial description of aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose partial possible solutions
• superficial evaluation of ideas and solutions to make elementary recommendations
>37% 9
In some simple familiar situations:
• variable recognition and superficial description of aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of problems and information
• rudimentary synthesis of information and ideas to propose partial possible solutions
• superficial evaluation of ideas and solutions to make elementary recommendations
>33% 8
In a limited range of simple familiar situations:
• variable recognition and superficial description of aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of aspects of problems and information
• unclear combination of information and ideas
• superficial evaluation of ideas and solutions
>28% 7
In a limited range of simple familiar situations:
• variable recognition and superficial description of aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies
• superficial explanation of ideas and solutions
• superficial analysis of aspects of problems and information
• unclear combination of information and ideas
• superficial evaluation of ideas and solutions
>24% 6
Disjointed recognition and statements about aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies; identification of a change about ideas, solutions and information; unclear combination of information and ideas >19% 5
Disjointed recognition and statements about aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies; identification of a change about ideas, solutions and information; unclear combination of information and ideas >14% 4
Disjointed recognition and statements about aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies; identification of a change about ideas, solutions and information; unclear combination of information and ideas >10% 3
Statements about aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles; statements about ideas, solutions and information; isolated and unclear combination of information and ideas >5% 2
Isolated and unclear statements about aspects of aerospace operational systems problems, knowledge, concepts and principles. >0% 1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Internal assessment 3: Aerospace solution (25%)

Students document the application of a problem-solving process in response to an identified real-world aerospace problem. The response is a coherent work that includes written paragraphs and annotations, diagrams, sketches, drawings, photographs, tables, spreadsheets and prototypes.

Assessment objectives

  1. Symbolise and explain ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and/or human factors.
  2. Determine success criteria for the aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem.
  3. Synthesise information and ideas to propose a possible aircraft performance systems and/or human factors solution.
  4. Generate an aircraft performance systems and/or human factors solution to provide data to determine the feasibility of the proposal.
  5. Evaluate and refine ideas and a solution to make justified recommendations.
  6. Make decisions about and use mode-appropriate features, language and conventions to communicate development of the solution.

Specifications

This task requires students to:

It is recommended that this task is designed so that students can develop a response in approximately 10 hours of class time.

Stimulus specifications

The teacher provides an appropriate aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem context, for example:

Conditions

Response requirements

Written and visual (including images, graphs, calculations and diagrams): up to 10 A4 pages, up to 2000 words

Mark allocation

Criterion Assessment objectives Marks
Symbolising and Communicating 2, 8 7
Determining and Generating 4, 6 9
Synthesising and Evaluating 5, 7 9
Total marks 25

Instrument-specific marking guide (IA3)

Symbolising and Communicating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• adept symbolisation and discerning explanation of ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and/or human factors with visual frameworks and flow charts, causal and feedback loops, diagrams and sketches and/or pictures
• discerning decision-making about, and proficient use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
6–7
• effective symbolisation and considered explanation of ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and/or human factors with visual frameworks and/or flow charts, causal and/or feedback loops, diagrams and/or sketches and/or pictures
• effective decision-making about, and fluent use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, language for a technical audience, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
4–5
• competent symbolisation and appropriate explanation of some ideas, a solution and relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and/or human factors with visual frameworks and/or flow charts, causal and/or feedback loops, diagrams and/or sketches and/or pictures
• appropriate decision-making about, and use of written and visual features to communicate about a solution, suitable language, grammatically accurate language structures, referencing conventions
2–3
• inconsistent symbolisation or superficial explanation of aspects of ideas, a solution or relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• inconsistent decision-making about, and inconsistent use of written and visual features, suitable language, grammar and language structures, referencing conventions.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Determining and Generating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• astute determination of essential success criteria for the aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem
• proficient generation of a solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• provide valid data to critically determine the feasibility of a solution
8–9
• reasoned determination of effective success criteria for the aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem
• effective generation of a solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• provide valid data to effectively determine the feasibility of a proposal
6–7
• logical determination of appropriate success criteria for the aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem
• adequate generation of a solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• to provide relevant data to determine the feasibility of a proposal
4–5
• reasonable determination of some success criteria for the aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem
• partial generation of a solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• elements of data to partially determine the feasibility of a proposal
2–3
• statements about some success criteria for the aircraft performance systems and/or human factors problem
• generation of elements of an aircraft performance systems and/or human factors solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

Synthesising and Evaluating

The student response has the following characteristics: Marks
• coherent and logical synthesis of relevant aerospace systems, technology, and research information and ideas to propose a possible solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• critical evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• discerning refinement of ideas and a solution using success criteria to make astute recommendations justified by data and research evidence
8–9
• logical synthesis of relevant aerospace systems, technology, and research information and ideas to propose a possible solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• reasoned evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• effective refinement of ideas and a solution using success criteria to make considered recommendations justified by data and research evidence
6–7
• simple synthesis of aerospace systems, technology, and research information and ideas to propose a solution, including aircraft performance systems and/or human factors
• feasible evaluation of ideas and a solution using success criteria
• adequate refinement of ideas and a solution using some success criteria to make fundamental recommendations justified by data and research evidence
4–5
• rudimentary synthesis of partial aerospace systems, technology, or research information and/or ideas to propose an aircraft performance systems and/or human factors solution
• superficial evaluation of ideas or a solution using some success criteria to make elementary recommendations
2–3
• unclear combinations of information or ideas
• identification of a change about an idea or the solution.
1
The student response does not match any of the descriptors above. 0

External assessment: Examination — combination response (25%)

External assessment is developed and marked by the QCAA. The external assessment in Aerospace Systems is common to all schools and administered under the same conditions, at the same time, on the same day.

Assessment objectives

  1. Recognise and describe problems, aerospace technology knowledge, concepts and principles, and systems thinking habits and systems thinking strategies in relation to aircraft performance systems and human factors.
  2. Symbolise and explain ideas, solutions and relationships in relation to aircraft performance systems and human factors.
  3. Analyse problems and information in relation to aircraft performance systems and human factors.
  4. Synthesise information and ideas to propose possible aircraft performance systems and human factors solutions.
  5. Evaluate and refine ideas and solutions to make justified recommendations.

Specifications

This examination:

Question specifications

The examination will be aligned to the specifications provided in the table below.

Focus of question Mark allocation (± 2%) Objective In these questions, students:
Simple familiar 60% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 1, 3 and 5, and can provide evidence of Objective 2. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions are obvious and have few elements
• the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, and in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex familiar 20% These questions can focus on any of the objectives. respond to situations where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements and connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to aerospace operational systems
• the required procedure is clear from the way the question is posed, and in a context that has been a focus of prior learning
Complex unfamiliar 20% Typically, these questions focus on Objectives 3, 5 and 7. choose and apply appropriate procedures in a situation where:
• relationships and interactions have a number of elements and connections are made with knowledge, concepts and principles in relation to aerospace operational systems
• the required procedure is not clear from the way the question is posed, and in a context in which students have had limited prior experience

Conditions

Glossary

The syllabus glossary is available at www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/common/snr_glossary_cognitive_verbs.pdf.

References

Airservices Australia 2014, How Airspace is Managed, www.airservicesaustralia.com/services/how-air-traffic-control-works/how-airspace-is-managed Civil Aviation Safety Authority 2014, Glossary of Terms, www.casa.gov.au/standard-page/glossary-terms Civil Aviation Safety Authority 2013, Aviation Abbreviations and Acronyms, www.casa.gov.au/about-us/standard-page/aviation-abbreviations-and-acronyms Ferguson, D 2009, Development of Technology Education in New Zealand Schools 1985-2008, http://technology.tki.org.nz/content/download/244/1153/file/DevelopmentofTechEducation-Sept09- Hudson, P 2001, Safety Culture — Theory and Practice, Centre for Safety Science, Universiteit Leiden, RIO MP-032, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235050886_Safety_Culture_-_Theory_and_Practice Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2008, Designing and Assessing Educational Objectives: Applying the new taxonomy, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California. Marzano, RJ & Kendall, JS 2007, The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2nd edn, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California. NASA 2001, Dictionary of Technical Terms for Aerospace Use, web edition edited by Glover D R Jr, NASA Lewis Research Centre, https://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/menu.html Reason, J 1997, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, 1st edn, Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire. Waters Foundation 2017, Systems Thinking: Habits of a Systems Thinker, http://watersfoundation.org/systems-thinking/habits-of-a-systems-thinker Williams, S 2017, Aviation Glossary - Defining the Language of Aviation, https://aviationglossary.com

Version history

Version Date of change Information
1.0 January 2024 Released for familiarisation and planning (with implementation starting in 2025)
1.1 July 2024 Released for implementation with minor updates
1.2 October 2024 ISBN removed
1.3 January 2026 File metadata changes to support new Syllabuses application functionality
1.4 March 2026 For subject matter in Unit 4 Topic 4:
• 'identify PRD: prohibited, restricted, danger area information' changed to 'identify Special Use Airspace (SUA): prohibited, restricted, danger and military operating areas'

For Internal assessment 1 Assessment objectives and ISMG:
• 'aerospace management' changed to 'aerospace regulatory systems'

For Internal assessment 3 Assessment objective 2 and ISMG:
• 'aircraft performance systems and human factors' changed to 'aircraft performance systems and/or human factors'

For Internal assessment 3 ISMG:
• 'visual frameworks, causal and feedback loops, flow charts, diagrams, sketches and/or pictures' reformatted to align with Internal assessment 1 ISMG